Kalina Burnat

402 citations
24 papers · 306 indexed · h-index 12

Kalina Burnat

23 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Kalina Burnat
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 158
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 115
  • Developmental Neuroscience 21
  • Neurology 39
  • Ophthalmology 38
Replace A. K. Harauzov with:
A. K. Harauzov Russia
Sally A. Marik United States
Claire E. Warner Australia
Joshua J. Royall United States
Katsuro Kameyama Japan
Hong‐Ping Xu United States
Megan L. Leyrer United States
Tania A. Seabrook United States
DeLaine D. Larsen United States
Daniel Lyngholm United Kingdom
Kalina Burnat relative to A. K. Harauzov Russia A. K. Harauzov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. K. Harauzov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kalina Burnat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kalina Burnat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kalina Burnat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kalina Burnat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kalina Burnat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kalina Burnat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kalina Burnat. The network helps show where Kalina Burnat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kalina Burnat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kalina Burnat Line = papers co-authored together Kalina Burnat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20240
3 20244
4 201712
5 20173
6 20156
7 201411
8 201312
9 201220
10 200942
11 20079
12 200717
13 200772
14 200623
15 200619
16 200513
17
Localization and characterization of large off-center ganglion cells in adult cat retina with neurofilament protein as revealed with the SMI-32 antibody
20041
18
Characteristic expression of neurofilament protein defines six cortical areas and several subcortical divisions in mouse visual system
20044
19 200217
20 19972

About Kalina Burnat

Kalina Burnat is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (11 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (158 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (115 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (21 citations). Kalina Burnat has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lut Arckens, Małgorzata Kossut, Elien Van der Gucht, Leen Van Brussel, Patrick R. Hof, Tjing‐Tjing Hu, Otto W. Witte, Lieselotte Cnops, Erik Vandenbussche and B Żernicki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026