Kaidong Li

719 citations
22 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Kaidong Li

20 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

Kaidong Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 74
  • Plant Science 128
  • Oncology 84
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 70
  • Pharmacology 26
Replace Jingyue Xu with:
Jingyue Xu China
Reza Hashemifesharaki Iran
Yani Zhang China
Sarah Gul Pakistan
Kusmardi Kusmardi Indonesia
Ahmed M. Alzohairy Egypt
Yiqing Liu China
Yu Guan China
Shidong Zhang China
Sachidanand Singh India
Kaidong Li relative to Jingyue Xu China Jingyue Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jingyue Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kaidong Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kaidong Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaidong Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaidong Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kaidong Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaidong Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaidong Li. The network helps show where Kaidong Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kaidong Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kaidong Li Line = papers co-authored together Kaidong Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020113
2 202186
3 202061
4 201949
5 201133
6 202026
7 202217
8 202016
9 202114
10 202113
11 202312
12 202012
13 20239
14 20138
15 20234
16 20243
17 20203
18 20252
19 20241
20 20241

About Kaidong Li

Kaidong Li is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neural Network Applications (7 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (4 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (3 papers), Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (2 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers) and Date Palm Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (74 citations), Plant Science (128 citations), Oncology (84 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (70 citations) and Pharmacology (26 citations). Kaidong Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Guanghui Wang, Xiangdong Gao, Wenbing Yao, Shuai Tang, Wei Liu, Krushi Patel, Ajay Bansal, Amit Rastogi, Jingyi Zhu and Cuncong Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Journal of Functional Foods, Journal of Biosciences, Carbohydrate Polymers and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact