K. Závěta
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- E. PollertS. KrupičkaMiroslav VeverkaOndřej KamanPavel VeverkaK. Knı́žekJ. SchneiderA. Lančok
- Topics
- Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (48 papers)Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (34 papers)Magnetic properties of thin films (29 papers)
In The Last Decade
K. Závěta
103 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Materials Chemistry 839
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 700
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 382
- Mechanical Engineering 341
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 296
Countries citing papers authored by K. Závěta
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Závěta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Závěta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Závěta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Závěta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Závěta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Závěta. The network helps show where K. Závěta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Závěta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Závěta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Závěta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Závěta. K. Závěta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Partially devitrified metallic glasses | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Coercive pinning of magnetic domain walls in partly crystallized amorphous alloys | 3 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About K. Závěta
K. Závěta is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (48 papers), Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (34 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (700 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (382 citations) and Materials Chemistry (839 citations). K. Závěta has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. Pollert, S. Krupička, Miroslav Veverka, Ondřej Kaman, Pavel Veverka, K. Knı́žek, J. Schneider, A. Lančok, L. Kraus and M. Maryško. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Chemistry of Materials and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.