Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization and ratio of total to selective extinction
1975492 citationsK. Serkowski et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Serkowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Serkowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Serkowski more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Serkowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Serkowski. The network helps show where K. Serkowski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Serkowski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Serkowski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Serkowski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. Serkowski. K. Serkowski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Serkowski, K., J. E. Frecker, William D. Heacox, & E. H. Roland. (1979). Precise Stellar Radial Velocities. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 11. 647.77 indexed citations
Serkowski, K., J. E. Frecker, William D. Heacox, & E. H. Roland. (1979). <title>Fabry-Perot Radial Velocity Spectrometer</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.5 indexed citations
4.
Serkowski, K.. (1978). Possibilities of Improving the Accuracy of Stellar Radial Velocities. 245.1 indexed citations
Serkowski, K.. (1975). A Field-Grating Imaging Spectrograph for Radial Velocity Mapping of Peculiar Galaxies. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 7. 451.1 indexed citations
7.
Serkowski, K.. (1973). Preparation for a Search for Planets Around Solar-Type Stars Using a Polarimetric Radial Velocity Meter.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 5. 418.1 indexed citations
Serkowski, K. & Wojciech Chojnacki. (1969). POLARIMETRIC OBSERVATIONS OF MAGNETIC STARS WITH TWO-CHANNEL POLARIMETER.. 1(16). 442–448.1 indexed citations
Serkowski, K.. (1967). Some possibilities of increasing the efficiency of optical telescopes. Observatory. 87. 259–262.1 indexed citations
14.
Jerzykiewicz, M. & K. Serkowski. (1966). The sun as a variable star III : photometric observations of Uranus, Neptune, and F and G type stars. 6(137). 295–323.2 indexed citations
15.
Serkowski, K.. (1965). Further Polarimetric Observations of Highly Polarized Stars in Two Spectral Regions. Acta Astronomica. 15. 79.1 indexed citations
Serkowski, K.. (1956). On the Density Distribution and the Ellipticity of the Components of the Eclipsing Variable CO Lacertae. 6. 57.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.