K. SCHADOW
- Computational Mechanics top 0.2%
- Combustion and flame dynamics 93
- Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows 48
- Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics 46
-
- Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies 16
- Aerospace Engineering top 0.2%
- Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows 85
- Rocket and propulsion systems research 14
- Combustion and Detonation Processes 10
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
-
- Energetic Materials and Combustion 8
K. SCHADOW
132 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Computational Mechanics 2.8k
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 573
- Aerospace Engineering 2.1k
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 308
- Environmental Engineering 283
Countries citing papers authored by K. SCHADOW
This map shows the geographic impact of K. SCHADOW's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. SCHADOW with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. SCHADOW more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. SCHADOW
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. SCHADOW. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. SCHADOW. The network helps show where K. SCHADOW may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. SCHADOW, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 2 | Military/Aerospace MEMS Applications - AVT Task Group 078 | 2004 | 1 |
| 3 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 254 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 127 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 28 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 20 | Turbulent Mixing and Combustion of Multi-Phase Reacting Flows in Ramjet and Ducted Rocket Environment. | 1981 | 2 |
About K. SCHADOW
K. SCHADOW is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (93 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (85 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (48 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (46 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (16 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (14 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (10 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (2.8k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (573 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (2.1k citations). K. SCHADOW has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ephraim Gutmark, K. J. Wilson, Ken Yu, Timothy P. Parr, Kenneth Wilson, D. M. Hanson-Parr, D. M. Parr, Kenneth H. Yu, Shozo Koshigoe and Robert A. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Propulsion and Power, Combustion Science and Technology, AIAA Journal, Experiments in Fluids and Combustion and Flame.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.