K. Piper
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Health Information Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- N. WoznitzaStephen BurkeGraham BothamleyRichard GodfreyJulie NightingaleAngshu BhowmikAline M. ThomasNigel Thomas
- Topics
- Radiology practices and education (33 papers)Radiation Dose and Imaging (25 papers)Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingFamily Practice
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
K. Piper
34 papers receiving 562 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 514
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 151
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 107
- Biomedical Engineering 81
- Health Information Management 43
Countries citing papers authored by K. Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Piper. The network helps show where K. Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Piper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Piper. K. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | Chest X-Ray Interpretation: Agreement Between Consultant Radiologists And A Reporting Radiographer In Clinical Practice In The United Kingdom | 2 |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | The accuracy of radiographers' reports in examinations of the skeletal system | 2 |
About K. Piper
K. Piper is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Family Practice, having authored 38 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (33 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (25 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (151 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (514 citations) and Family Practice (40 citations). K. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include N. Woznitza, Stephen Burke, Graham Bothamley, Richard Godfrey, Julie Nightingale, Angshu Bhowmik, Aline M. Thomas, Nigel Thomas, Stéphanie Cox and Ian O. Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, Lung Cancer and European Journal of Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.