K. J. Gibson

892 total citations
25 papers, 458 citations indexed

About

K. J. Gibson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. J. Gibson has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 458 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 11 papers in Materials Chemistry and 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in K. J. Gibson's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (22 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers). K. J. Gibson is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (22 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers). K. J. Gibson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. K. J. Gibson's co-authors include J. Harrison, H. R. Wilson, R. Scannell, G. Naylor, M. J. Walsh, S. Shibaev, T. O’Gorman, M. R. Dunstan, G. J. Tallents and David Barton and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Review of Scientific Instruments and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

In The Last Decade

K. J. Gibson

24 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K. J. Gibson United Kingdom 14 386 186 164 117 70 25 458
M. Clever Germany 11 363 0.9× 105 0.6× 240 1.5× 85 0.7× 55 0.8× 19 421
H. Bergsåker Sweden 11 319 0.8× 176 0.9× 147 0.9× 43 0.4× 55 0.8× 34 386
E. de la Cal Spain 13 410 1.1× 159 0.9× 222 1.4× 59 0.5× 111 1.6× 54 517
D.A. Ennis United States 15 355 0.9× 219 1.2× 110 0.7× 65 0.6× 55 0.8× 45 475
A. Fassina Italy 14 418 1.1× 194 1.0× 112 0.7× 116 1.0× 123 1.8× 48 496
M. Hoppe Sweden 9 209 0.5× 66 0.4× 94 0.6× 109 0.9× 64 0.9× 33 302
A. Lvovskiy United States 12 378 1.0× 198 1.1× 92 0.6× 81 0.7× 87 1.2× 37 413
T. Onchi Japan 9 264 0.7× 87 0.5× 71 0.4× 68 0.6× 87 1.2× 78 314
A.W. Morris United Kingdom 16 672 1.7× 363 2.0× 221 1.3× 183 1.6× 180 2.6× 29 730
R. Ikezoe Japan 11 301 0.8× 118 0.6× 83 0.5× 47 0.4× 84 1.2× 81 337

Countries citing papers authored by K. J. Gibson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. J. Gibson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. J. Gibson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. J. Gibson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. J. Gibson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. J. Gibson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. J. Gibson. The network helps show where K. J. Gibson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. J. Gibson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. J. Gibson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. J. Gibson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. J. Gibson. K. J. Gibson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Morgan, T.W., et al.. (2020). Thermographic investigation of the effect of plasma exposure on the surface of a MAST upgrade divertor tile in Magnum-PSI. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 25. 100832–100832. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bowman, C., J. Harrison, B. Lipschultz, et al.. (2020). Development and simulation of multi-diagnostic Bayesian analysis for 2D inference of divertor plasma characteristics. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 62(4). 45014–45014. 25 indexed citations
3.
Horváth, L., C. F. Maggi, F. J. Casson, et al.. (2018). Inter-ELM evolution of the edge current density in JET-ILW type I ELMy H-mode plasmas. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 60(8). 85003–85003. 4 indexed citations
4.
Bowman, C., David Dickinson, L. Horváth, et al.. (2017). Pedestal evolution physics in low triangularity JET tokamak discharges with ITER-like wall. Nuclear Fusion. 58(1). 16021–16021. 14 indexed citations
5.
Leyland, Matthew, M. Beurskens, J. Flanagan, et al.. (2016). Edge profile analysis of Joint European Torus (JET) Thomson scattering data: Quantifying the systematic error due to edge localised mode synchronisation. Review of Scientific Instruments. 87(1). 13507–13507. 6 indexed citations
6.
Leyland, Matthew, M. Beurskens, L. Frassinetti, et al.. (2014). The H-mode pedestal structure and its role on confinement in JET with a carbon and metal wall. Nuclear Fusion. 55(1). 13019–13019. 33 indexed citations
7.
Widdowson, A., K. Heinola, A. Baron-Wiecheć, et al.. (2014). Analysis of rotating collectors from the private region of JET with carbon wall and metallic ITER-like wall. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 463. 818–821. 7 indexed citations
8.
O’Gorman, T., et al.. (2014). Neoclassical tearing mode control using vertical shifts on MAST. Nuclear Fusion. 54(8). 82002–82002. 2 indexed citations
9.
Silburn, S., J. Harrison, J. Howard, et al.. (2014). Coherence imaging of scrape-off-layer and divertor impurity flows in the Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak (invited). Review of Scientific Instruments. 85(11). 11D703–11D703. 31 indexed citations
10.
Choi, M., G.S. Yun, Y.S. Park, et al.. (2014). Improved accuracy in the estimation of the tearing mode stability parameters (Δ′ andwc) using 2D ECEI data in KSTAR. Nuclear Fusion. 54(8). 83010–83010. 35 indexed citations
11.
Sykes, A., M. Gryaznevich, David R. Kingham, et al.. (2013). The spherical Tokamak path to fusion power — Revisited. 43. 1–6. 3 indexed citations
12.
Gibson, K. J., et al.. (2012). MASTにおけるm/n=2/1の新古典テアリングモードの構造と進化に対する有限放射状輸送の影響. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 54(8). 1–85001. 10 indexed citations
13.
O’Gorman, T., G. Naylor, K. J. Gibson, et al.. (2012). A field programmable gate array unit for the diagnosis and control of neoclassical tearing modes on MAST. Review of Scientific Instruments. 83(10). 10E312–10E312. 1 indexed citations
14.
Thornton, A., K. J. Gibson, J. Harrison, et al.. (2012). Characterization of disruption mitigation via massive gas injection on MAST. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 54(12). 125007–125007. 14 indexed citations
15.
Gibson, K. J., et al.. (2012). The influence of finite radial transport on the structure and evolution ofm/n= 2/1 neoclassical tearing modes on MAST. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 54(8). 85001–85001. 30 indexed citations
16.
Harrison, J., et al.. (2011). Characterisation of detached plasmas on the MAST tokamak. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 415(1). S379–S382. 17 indexed citations
17.
Meyer, H., M. F. M. de Bock, N. J. Conway, et al.. (2011). L–H transition and pedestal studies on MAST. Nuclear Fusion. 51(11). 113011–113011. 28 indexed citations
18.
Scannell, R., M. J. Walsh, M. R. Dunstan, et al.. (2010). A 130 point Nd:YAG Thomson scattering diagnostic on MAST. Review of Scientific Instruments. 81(10). 10D520–10D520. 52 indexed citations
19.
Harrison, J., S. Lisgo, G. Counsell, et al.. (2009). Interpretive modelling of scrape-off plasmas on the MAST tokamak. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 390-391. 392–394. 1 indexed citations
20.
Silburn, S., R. M. Sharples, C. Michael, et al.. (2004). 2D Impurity Flow Imaging on MAST with Coherence Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026