K. F. Drew
- History top 1%
- Classics top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Norman J. G. PoundsТ. Μ. Charles-EdwardsBrian StockPeter ArnadeRobert L. HumphreysR. Keller KopfCharles M. RaddingEdward Peters
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (11 papers)Classical Studies and Legal History (5 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewICES Journal of Marine ScienceThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaVenezuela
In The Last Decade
K. F. Drew
32 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- History 121
- Classics 95
- Global and Planetary Change 94
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 79
- Political Science and International Relations 58
Countries citing papers authored by K. F. Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of K. F. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. F. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. F. Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. F. Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. F. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. F. Drew. The network helps show where K. F. Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. F. Drew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. F. Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. F. Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. F. Drew. K. F. Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | Distributed Machine Intelligence for Automated Survivability | 5 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Public vs. Private Enforcement of the Law in the Early Middle Ages: Fifth to Twelfth Centuries | 2 |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Law and society in early Medieval Europe : studies in legal history | 3 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 57 | |
| 15 | Legal Materials as a Source for Early Medieval Social History | 1 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | The Lombard Laws | 19 |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About K. F. Drew
K. F. Drew is a scholar working on Classics, History and Archeology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (5 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (95 citations), History (121 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (79 citations). K. F. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Norman J. G. Pounds, Т. Μ. Charles-Edwards, Brian Stock, Peter Arnade, Robert L. Humphreys, R. Keller Kopf, Charles M. Radding, Edward Peters, Kiersten L. Curti and Janet A. Nye. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, ICES Journal of Marine Science and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.