Daniel Schütze

495 citations
15 papers · 145 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schütze

15 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Daniel Schütze
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Oceanography 32
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 32
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 52
  • Aerospace Engineering 31
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 62
Replace S. Baang with:
S. Baang South Korea
Fumio Abe Japan
V.B. Yurchenko Ireland
T. Bräuer Germany
W. A. Holmes United States
Tom Nitta Japan
Xiao Xue China
C. O’Sullivan Ireland
A. Molinero Spain
Anna Katharina Huhn Germany
Daniel Schütze relative to S. Baang South Korea S. Baang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
S. Baang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schütze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schütze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schütze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schütze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schütze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schütze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schütze. The network helps show where Daniel Schütze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schütze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schütze Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schütze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201531
2 201124
3 201416
4 201011
5 201710
6 201010
7 201410
8 20137
9 20166
10 20145
11 20145
12
LISA-like Laser Ranging for GRACE Follow-on
20134
13 20153
14 19852
15
Kooperation zwischen Volkswirtschaftslehre und Jurisprudenz
19981

About Daniel Schütze

Daniel Schütze is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (7 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (5 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (3 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (3 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (2 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (2 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (32 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (32 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (52 citations), Aerospace Engineering (31 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (62 citations). Daniel Schütze has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Heinzel, Vitali Müller, K. Buse, K. Danzmann, Benjamin Sheard, Oliver Gerberding, W. Mader, T. Jungk, Wilfried Assenmacher and Markus Ackermann. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Applied Physics Letters, physica status solidi (a), Applied Optics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact