K. C. Chang
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- John Winthrop HaegerBarry B. BlakeleyChun‐shu ChangEugene CooperPeter S. WellsDonn BayardC. C. Lamberg‐KarlovskyMark Fitch
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers)Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
K. C. Chang
17 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Sociology and Political Science 180
- Paleontology 110
- Anthropology 109
- Geography, Planning and Development 66
- Food Science 53
Countries citing papers authored by K. C. Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of K. C. Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. C. Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. C. Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. C. Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. C. Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. C. Chang. The network helps show where K. C. Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. C. Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. C. Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. C. Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. C. Chang. K. C. Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collections | 1 |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | Circumpacific Substratum of Ancient Chinese Civilization | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 110 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | Man in the Choshui and Tatu River Valleys in Central Taiwan: Preliminary Report of an Interdisciplinary Project, 1972-1973 Season | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About K. C. Chang
K. C. Chang is a scholar working on Paleontology, Geography, Planning and Development and Archeology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (22 citations), Paleontology (110 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (66 citations). K. C. Chang has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Winthrop Haeger, Barry B. Blakeley, Chun‐shu Chang, Eugene Cooper, Peter S. Wells, Donn Bayard, C. C. Lamberg‐Karlovsky, Mark Fitch, Edna Nyangau and Marc K. Hellerstein. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, The American Historical Review and Annual Review of Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.