K. Brad Wray

2.0k total citations
80 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

K. Brad Wray is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Global and Planetary Change and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Brad Wray has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 17 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in K. Brad Wray's work include Philosophy and History of Science (53 papers), Science and Climate Studies (17 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (16 papers). K. Brad Wray is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (53 papers), Science and Climate Studies (17 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (16 papers). K. Brad Wray collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Canada. K. Brad Wray's co-authors include Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Samuel Arbesman, Kristina Rolin, Søren R. Paludan, Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen, Paul Hoyningen‐Huene, Thomas Pradeu, Andreas Pichlmair and Trine H. Mogensen and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell Reports, Scientometrics and Social Studies of Science.

In The Last Decade

K. Brad Wray

70 papers receiving 935 citations

Peers

K. Brad Wray
W. H. Newton‐Smith United Kingdom
Howard Sankey Australia
Julian Reiss United Kingdom
Hans Radder Netherlands
Ryan Muldoon United States
Susan Haack United States
Cailin O’Connor United States
W. H. Newton‐Smith United Kingdom
K. Brad Wray
Citations per year, relative to K. Brad Wray K. Brad Wray (= 1×) peers W. H. Newton‐Smith

Countries citing papers authored by K. Brad Wray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Brad Wray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Brad Wray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Brad Wray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Brad Wray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Brad Wray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Brad Wray. The network helps show where K. Brad Wray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Brad Wray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Brad Wray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Brad Wray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Brad Wray. K. Brad Wray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoyningen‐Huene, Paul & K. Brad Wray. (2025). Discussion Note on Hasok Chang: Realism for Realistic People. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 56(2). 275–286.
2.
Wray, K. Brad, Søren R. Paludan, Lutz Bornmann, & Robin Haunschild. (2024). Using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) to analyze the research and publication culture in immunology. Scientometrics. 129(6). 3271–3283. 3 indexed citations
3.
Paludan, Søren R., Thomas Pradeu, Andreas Pichlmair, et al.. (2024). Early host defense against virus infections. Cell Reports. 43(12). 115070–115070. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wray, K. Brad. (2021). Small Bohr. Metascience. 31(1). 27–28.
6.
Wray, K. Brad. (2020). Paradigms in Structure: finally, a count. Scientometrics. 125(1). 823–828. 1 indexed citations
7.
Wray, K. Brad. (2018). A new twist to the No Miracles Argument for the success of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 69. 86–89.
8.
Wray, K. Brad. (2018). Kuhn, the History of Chemistry, and the Philosophy of Science. 9(1). 75–92. 1 indexed citations
9.
Wray, K. Brad. (2016). Discarded theories: the role of changing interests. Synthese. 196(2). 553–569. 4 indexed citations
10.
Wray, K. Brad. (2015). The methodological defense of realism scrutinized. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 54. 74–79. 7 indexed citations
11.
Wray, K. Brad. (2015). Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 29(1). 61–73. 24 indexed citations
12.
Arbesman, Samuel & K. Brad Wray. (2013). Demographics and the fate of the young scientist. Social Studies of Science. 43(2). 282–286. 3 indexed citations
13.
Wray, K. Brad. (2012). The Future of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Topoi. 32(1). 75–79. 5 indexed citations
14.
Wray, K. Brad. (2010). Kuhn and the Discovery of Paradigms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 41(3). 380–397. 28 indexed citations
15.
Wray, K. Brad. (2010). Introduction: Collective Knowledge and Science. Episteme. 7(3). 181–184. 5 indexed citations
16.
Wray, K. Brad. (2009). Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate. Scientometrics. 83(2). 471–476. 8 indexed citations
17.
Wray, K. Brad. (2009). The salaries of Italian Renaissance professors. Scientometrics. 80(2). 351–357. 1 indexed citations
19.
Wray, K. Brad. (2002). Knowledge and inquiry : readings in epistemology. 14 indexed citations
20.
Wray, K. Brad. (1995). Reinterpreting § 56 of Frege's The Foundations of Arithmetic. KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026