Countries citing papers authored by Tom Vander Beken
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Vander Beken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Vander Beken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Vander Beken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Vander Beken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Vander Beken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Vander Beken. The network helps show where Tom Vander Beken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Vander Beken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Vander Beken.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Vander Beken based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Vander Beken. Tom Vander Beken is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wittouck, Ciska, Freya Vander Laenen, & Tom Vander Beken. (2013). Tucht en gedetineerden met een psychiatrische problematiek. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
10.
Ruyver, Brice De, Marleen Easton, Lieven Pauwels, et al.. (2009). Contemporary Issues in the Empirical Study of Crime... Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).13 indexed citations
11.
Beken, Tom Vander, et al.. (2009). Vulnerabilität der Wirtschaft für Organisierte Kriminalität: Vulnerabilitätsstudien zur Prävention am Beispiel der Abfallentsorgungsindustrie. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 63(1). 28–35.2 indexed citations
12.
Duyne, Petrus C. van & Tom Vander Beken. (2009). The Incantations of the EU Organised Crime Policy Making. Research portal (Tilburg University).1 indexed citations
13.
Rousseau, Sandra, et al.. (2009). Milieucriminaliteit in handen van strafrechters en beboetingsambtenaren: feiten uit Vlaanderen en Brussel. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
14.
Beken, Tom Vander, et al.. (2008). Interstatelijke overbrenging van gedetineerden vanuit en naar België, Er was eens… re-integratie|. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 29(4). 7–24.3 indexed citations
15.
Daele, Stijn Van, Tom Vander Beken, & Nicholas Dorn. (2007). Waste Management and Crime - Regulatory, Business and Product Vulnerabilities. Environmental Policy and Law. 37(1). 34–38.6 indexed citations
16.
Laenen, Freya Vander, Brice De Ruyver, Gert Vermeulen, & Tom Vander Beken. (2003). International drug policy, status quaestionis, compendium of articles. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
17.
Beken, Tom Vander, et al.. (2002). The fight against the illegal use of growth promoters in Europe. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
18.
Ruyver, Brice De, et al.. (2002). Multidisciplinary drug policies and the UN drug treaties. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).5 indexed citations
19.
Ruyver, Brice De & Tom Vander Beken. (1999). Corruption and organized crime. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
20.
Beken, Tom Vander. (1993). Schengen: proeftuin voor de Europese gemeenschap. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.