Jyothi Thomas

463 citations
24 papers · 208 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jyothi Thomas

15 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Jyothi Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Health Information Management 124
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 17
  • Artificial Intelligence 72
  • Insect Science 20
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 30
Replace Di Miao with:
Di Miao China
Ahmet Saygılı Türkiye
Gaurav Sethi India
Xue Zhu China
Aleka Melese Ayalew Ethiopia
Sherif E. Abdelhamid United States
K. Vijay India
S. Sophia India
Edgar Acuña Puerto Rico
Zi Lin China
Jyothi Thomas relative to Di Miao China Di Miao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Di Miao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jyothi Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jyothi Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jyothi Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jyothi Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jyothi Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jyothi Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jyothi Thomas. The network helps show where Jyothi Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jyothi Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jyothi Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Jyothi Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016144
2 200413
3 202213
4 20218
5 20234
6 20244
7 20104
8 20233
9 20243
10 20132
11 20232
12 20152
13 20242
14 20241
15 20151
16 20241
17 20241
18 20240
19 20230
20 20240

About Jyothi Thomas

Jyothi Thomas is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Insect Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Silkworms and Sericulture Research (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (2 papers), Infrared Thermography in Medicine (2 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (124 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (17 citations), Artificial Intelligence (72 citations), Insect Science (20 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (30 citations). Jyothi Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alan Blair, Nick Barnes and Bhadrachalam Chitturi. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Biology Open, Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture and Indian Journal of Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact