Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Microplastics pollution in different aquatic environments and biota: A review of recent studies
2018515 citationsShahabaldin Rezania, Junboum Park et al.profile →
High efficiency removal of heavy metals using tire-derived activated carbon vs commercial activated carbon: Insights into the adsorption mechanisms
2020342 citationsRahim shahrokhi, Junboum Park et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Junboum Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Junboum Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Junboum Park more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Junboum Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Junboum Park. The network helps show where Junboum Park may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Junboum Park
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Junboum Park.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Junboum Park based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Junboum Park. Junboum Park is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, Kyung Tae, et al.. (2016). Selective detection of Hg²⁺ using fluorescent rhodamine-functionalized Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles. RSC Advances.1 indexed citations
13.
Rhee, Sungsu, Seung-Hak Lee, & Junboum Park. (2010). Simultaneous Removal of Cd and Cr(VI) in the Subsurface Using Permeable Reactive Barrier Filled with Fe-loaded Zeolite: Soil Box Experiment. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society. 26(10). 61–68.1 indexed citations
14.
Oh, Chamteut, et al.. (2010). Sorption Characteristics of Arsenic on Furnace Slag by Adsorption Isotherm and Kinetic Sorption Experiments. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society. 26(9). 37–45.5 indexed citations
15.
Christ, Martin, et al.. (2009). Shear Strength of Frozen Sand. 394–399.1 indexed citations
16.
Chung, Jaeshik, et al.. (2008). Assessment of Sorption Behavior on Slag Against Heavy Metals. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society. 24(6). 17–25.1 indexed citations
17.
Rhee, Sungsu, et al.. (2007). Estimating Partition Coefficients of Partitioning Tracers between Water and BTEX Mixtures. 12(2). 47–54.1 indexed citations
18.
Park, Junboum, et al.. (2000). Laboratory Tests For The Development Of Contaminant Leakage Detection System In Soil. ISRM International Symposium.1 indexed citations
19.
Park, Junboum, et al.. (1998). Deformation Behavior of Pipe Buried in Weathered Soil Under Surface Load. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 18. 391–391.1 indexed citations
20.
Finno, Richard J., et al.. (1989). Summary of pile capacity predictions and comparison with observed behaviour. 356–385.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.