Julius Steffen

1.0k citations
43 papers · 422 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Julius Steffen

37 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Julius Steffen
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 118
  • Family Practice 9
  • Modeling and Simulation 14
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Nathalie Lorentz with:
Nathalie Lorentz Luxembourg
Helen Coelho United Kingdom
Aswathy Sreedevi India
Maolin Du China
Ramazan Azim Okyay Türkiye
Erfan Taherifard Iran
Mohamed Ali Alzain Saudi Arabia
Juan S. Izquierdo‐Condoy Ecuador
Wei Yen Lim Singapore
Mariangela Valentina Puci Italy
Julius Steffen relative to Nathalie Lorentz Luxembourg Nathalie Lorentz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Nathalie Lorentz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Steffen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Steffen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Steffen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Steffen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Steffen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Steffen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Steffen. The network helps show where Julius Steffen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Steffen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Steffen Line = papers co-authored together Julius Steffen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20241
4 20240
5 20245
6 20241
7 20240
8 20233
9 20235
10 20234
11 202212
12 202217
13 202117
14 20217
15 20215
16 202018
17 2020113
18 201528
19 20135
20 19926

About Julius Steffen

Julius Steffen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice, Biological Psychiatry, Epidemiology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (20 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (12 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (4 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (129 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (118 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Modeling and Simulation (14 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Julius Steffen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Hüber, Jenny Schlichtiger, Stefan Brunner, Steffen Maßberg, Jörg Hausleiter, Daniel Braun, Martin Orban, Simon Deseive, Hans Theiß and Konstantinos D. Rizas. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Research in Cardiology, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Diabetic Medicine, Journal of Personalized Medicine and European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026