Julius Scherzer

1.6k citations
19 papers · 917 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julius Scherzer

19 papers receiving 854 citations

Peers

Julius Scherzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Inorganic Chemistry 549
  • Catalysis 203
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 96
  • Analytical Chemistry 103
  • Mechanical Engineering 380
Replace G. Caeiro with:
G. Caeiro Portugal
Alan W. Peters United States
Arthur W. Chester United States
Thomas F. Degnan United States
Sachio Asaoka Japan
R.B. LaPierre United States
E. E. Knyazeva Russia
Jan‐Erik Otterstedt Sweden
Bernard L. Meyers United States
Hiroshi Fujitsu Japan
Julius Scherzer relative to G. Caeiro Portugal G. Caeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. Caeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Scherzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Scherzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Scherzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Scherzer. The network helps show where Julius Scherzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Julius Scherzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Scherzer Line = papers co-authored together Julius Scherzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Dendromass, raw material of the future - background and first results of the research project DENDROM.
20072
2 1996260
3 199166
4 19905
5 1989190
6 198828
7
Tests show effects of nitrogen compounds on commercial fluid cat cracking catalysts
19863
8 19839
9 198120
10 197866
11 197847
12 19783
13 197739
14 197520
15 197541
16 197398
17 19689
18 196610
19 19591

About Julius Scherzer

Julius Scherzer is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Catalysis, Electrochemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (10 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (5 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (4 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (2 papers) and Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (549 citations), Catalysis (203 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (96 citations), Analytical Chemistry (103 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (380 citations). Julius Scherzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Bass, Leallyn B. Clapp, John O. Edwards, Bernd Hirschl, Hubert Jochheim, Bettina Schneider, Ansgar Quinkenstein, Philipp Grundmann, Holger Grünewald and Dieter Murach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Catalysis, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Catalysis Reviews and Oil & gas journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026