Julius Berger

29 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Julius Berger
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Pharmacology 174
  • Small Animals 66
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 140
  • Animal Science and Zoology 77
  • Organic Chemistry 143
Replace Tsutomu Unemoto with:
Tsutomu Unemoto Japan
Ning G. Pon United States
M. Koyama Japan
James R. Baarda United States
Arthur Stempel Switzerland
James W. Marshall Germany
Guy Vandenbussche Belgium
Asao Murai United States
Heather D. Bean United States
James W. Chamberlin United States
Julius Berger relative to Tsutomu Unemoto Japan Tsutomu Unemoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Tsutomu Unemoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Berger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Berger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Berger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Berger. The network helps show where Julius Berger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Berger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Berger Line = papers co-authored together Julius Berger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970188
2 1951137
3 197354
4 197445
5 197441
6
The resistance of a field strain of Haemonchus contortus to five benzimidazole anthelmintics in current use.
197533
7 197331
8 197426
9 197422
10 197820
11 195816
12
Production, isolation, and synthesis of the coumermycins (sugordomycins), a new streptomycete antibiotic complex.
196514
13 196912
14 197911
15 197010
16 197010
17 20238
18 19708
19 19578
20 19697

About Julius Berger

Julius Berger is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (174 citations), Small Animals (66 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (140 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (77 citations) and Organic Chemistry (143 citations). Julius Berger has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Katchalsky, Mella Paecht‐Horowitz, M. W. Goldberg, L. H. Sternbach, William E. Scott, Arthur Stempel, John Westley, Ralph H. Evans, Hubert Maehr and S. Teitel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Antibiotics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Neurochemical Research, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact