Júlio Mendes
- Insect Science top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Arício Xavier LinharesCátia Antunes de Mello-PatiuFernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐MelloCecília LomônacoJ. A. GuimarãesMárcia Souto CouriRosângela Maria RodriguesLuísa N. Domingues
- Topics
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (19 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers)Dermatological diseases and infestations (13 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMemórias do Instituto Oswaldo CruzMedical and Veterinary Entomology
In The Last Decade
Júlio Mendes
38 papers receiving 539 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Insect Science 366
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 145
- Infectious Diseases 137
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 91
- Plant Science 82
Countries citing papers authored by Júlio Mendes
This map shows the geographic impact of Júlio Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Júlio Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Júlio Mendes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Júlio Mendes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Júlio Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Júlio Mendes. The network helps show where Júlio Mendes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Júlio Mendes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Júlio Mendes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Júlio Mendes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Júlio Mendes. Júlio Mendes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | THE EFFICACY OF 25% DIFLUBENZURON FED TO POULTRY TO CONTROL SYNANTHROPIC FLIES IN THE DUNG | 4 |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Júlio Mendes
Júlio Mendes is a scholar working on Insect Science, Infectious Diseases and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (19 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers) and Dermatological diseases and infestations (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (366 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (145 citations) and Infectious Diseases (137 citations). Júlio Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arício Xavier Linhares, Cátia Antunes de Mello-Patiu, Fernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐Mello, Cecília Lomônaco, J. A. Guimarães, Márcia Souto Couri, Rosângela Maria Rodrigues, Luísa N. Domingues, W. W. Koller and Sérgio Roberto Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz and Medical and Veterinary Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.