Julieta Aprea
About
In The Last Decade
Julieta Aprea
9 papers receiving 424 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Molecular Biology 303
- Cancer Research 191
- Plant Science 95
- Developmental Neuroscience 49
- Genetics 33
Countries citing papers authored by Julieta Aprea
This map shows the geographic impact of Julieta Aprea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julieta Aprea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julieta Aprea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julieta Aprea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julieta Aprea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julieta Aprea. The network helps show where Julieta Aprea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julieta Aprea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julieta Aprea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julieta Aprea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julieta Aprea. Julieta Aprea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 176 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 44 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.