Julie Linsey

5.5k total citations
195 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Julie Linsey is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Linsey has authored 195 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 134 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 62 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 42 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Julie Linsey's work include Design Education and Practice (132 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (50 papers) and Product Development and Customization (40 papers). Julie Linsey is often cited by papers focused on Design Education and Practice (132 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (50 papers) and Product Development and Customization (40 papers). Julie Linsey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Russia. Julie Linsey's co-authors include Kristin L. Wood, Vimal Viswanathan, Arthur B. Markman, Robert Nagel, Jonathan Cagan, Tolga Kurtoglu, Jeremy T. Murphy, Katherine Fu, Daniel A. McAdams and Christian D. Schunn and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Mechanical Design and Journal of Engineering Education.

In The Last Decade

Julie Linsey

180 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Linsey United States 30 2.5k 1.3k 908 364 354 195 3.6k
Kees Dorst Australia 26 3.4k 1.3× 1.7k 1.3× 1.3k 1.4× 458 1.3× 836 2.4× 58 5.2k
Maria C. Yang United States 28 1.5k 0.6× 582 0.5× 585 0.6× 304 0.8× 303 0.9× 136 2.7k
Amaresh Chakrabarti India 27 2.9k 1.1× 1.0k 0.8× 1.6k 1.7× 420 1.2× 248 0.7× 183 4.7k
Larry Leifer United States 30 2.2k 0.9× 754 0.6× 578 0.6× 702 1.9× 572 1.6× 217 5.6k
John S. Gero Australia 40 4.9k 1.9× 2.4k 1.9× 1.8k 2.0× 935 2.6× 655 1.9× 325 7.2k
Luciënne Blessing Singapore 26 1.4k 0.5× 344 0.3× 974 1.1× 206 0.6× 246 0.7× 140 3.1k
Shanna Daly United States 26 1.4k 0.5× 889 0.7× 386 0.4× 145 0.4× 223 0.6× 171 2.5k
Ashok K. Goel United States 31 1.4k 0.6× 441 0.3× 513 0.6× 150 0.4× 123 0.3× 270 3.9k
Jonathan Cagan United States 47 3.7k 1.5× 1.2k 1.0× 1.7k 1.9× 1.2k 3.3× 260 0.7× 300 6.9k
Joshua D. Summers United States 30 2.6k 1.0× 361 0.3× 1.3k 1.5× 183 0.5× 140 0.4× 310 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Linsey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Linsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Linsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Linsey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Linsey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Linsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Linsey. The network helps show where Julie Linsey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Linsey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Linsey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Linsey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Linsey. Julie Linsey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
3.
Nagel, Robert, et al.. (2023). A Typology for Learning: Examining How Academic Makerspaces Support Learning for Students. Journal of Mechanical Design. 145(9). 2 indexed citations
4.
Bohm, Matt R., et al.. (2020). Board 18: The Impact of Functional Modeling in an Engineering Design Curriculum. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
5.
Nagel, Robert, et al.. (2020). Board 138: Understanding Academic Makerspaces through a Longitudinal Study at Three Universities. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations
7.
Bohm, Matt R., et al.. (2020). Exploring Differences in Senior and Sophomore Engineering Students’ Mental Models of Common Products. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
8.
Bohm, Matt R., et al.. (2020). A Longitudinal Exploration of Students’ Functional Modeling Abilities. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 2 indexed citations
9.
Talley, Kimberly, et al.. (2020). Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations
10.
Bohm, Matt R., et al.. (2020). Validation of a Mental Model Elicitation Instrument through Deployment of Control Groups in an Undergraduate Engineering Program. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hammond, Tracy, et al.. (2018). Board # 52:Engineering Drawing for the Next Generation: Students Gaining Additional Skills in the Same Timeframe. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
12.
Nelson, Jacob, et al.. (2017). A bridge to systems thinking in engineering design: An examination of students’ ability to identify functions at varying levels of abstraction. Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 31(4). 535–549. 11 indexed citations
13.
Forest, Craig R., Roxanne Moore, Barbara Fasse, et al.. (2014). The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture.. AEE Journal. 4(2). 95 indexed citations
14.
Field, Martin J., et al.. (2011). Sketch recognition algorithms for comparing complex and unpredictable shapes. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2436–2441. 17 indexed citations
15.
Schmidt, Susanne, et al.. (2011). Distributed ideation: idea generation in distributed capstone engineering design teams. International journal of engineering education. 27(6). 1281–1294. 16 indexed citations
16.
Viswanathan, Vimal & Julie Linsey. (2011). Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost. 119–130. 61 indexed citations
17.
Linsey, Julie & Vimal Viswanathan. (2010). Innovation skills for tomorrow’s sustainable designers. International journal of engineering education. 26(2). 451–461. 7 indexed citations
18.
Linsey, Julie, et al.. (2009). From Tootsie Rolls to Broken Bones: An Innovative Approach for Active Learning in Mechanics of Materials.. AEE Journal. 1(3). 30 indexed citations
19.
Hey, Jonathan, Julie Linsey, Alice M. Agogino, & Kristin L. Wood. (2008). Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International journal of engineering education. 24(2). 283–294. 114 indexed citations
20.
Linsey, Julie, et al.. (2007). Effects of Analogous Product Representation on Design-By-Analogy. Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026