Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products
Countries citing papers authored by Julie A. Caswell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie A. Caswell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie A. Caswell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie A. Caswell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie A. Caswell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie A. Caswell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie A. Caswell. The network helps show where Julie A. Caswell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie A. Caswell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie A. Caswell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie A. Caswell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Julie A. Caswell. Julie A. Caswell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Monteiro, Diogo M. Souza & Julie A. Caswell. (2006). Traceability Adoption at the Farm Level: An Empirical Analysis in the Portuguese Pear Industry.. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
Teisl, Mario F. & Julie A. Caswell. (2003). Information Policy and Genetically Modified Food: Weighting the Benefits and Costs. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
12.
Caswell, Julie A.. (2003). Trends in food safety standards and regulation implications for developing countries. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.6 indexed citations
Henson, Spencer & Julie A. Caswell. (2001). La regulación de la seguridad alimentaria: perspectiva general de las cuestiones actuales. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 7–26.3 indexed citations
15.
Caswell, Julie A., et al.. (2000). A Model Of The Implementation Of Quality Management Systems For Credence Attributes. ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst).5 indexed citations
16.
Caswell, Julie A.. (2000). Labeling policy for GMOs: to each his own?. MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri). 3(1). 1–5.27 indexed citations
17.
Caswell, Julie A.. (2000). Analyzing Quality and Quality Assurance (Including Labeling) for GMOs. MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri). 3(4). 225–230.25 indexed citations
Caswell, Julie A.. (1999). Food Quality Management Systems: A Research Update. Journal of food distribution research. 30(1).1 indexed citations
20.
Caswell, Julie A.. (1998). Should Use of Genetically Modified Organisms Be Labeled. MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri). 1(1).37 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.