Julian Schofield

653 citations
35 papers · 516 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Exercise and Physiological Responses
    • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways

Papers in

Julian Schofield

27 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Julian Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Molecular Biology 330
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
  • Genetics 94
  • Physiology 82
Replace Takahito Niiyama with:
Takahito Niiyama Japan
Sara Gibertini Italy
HG Brunner Netherlands
Rita Silva Portugal
Julie F. McManus Australia
Usue Etxaniz United States
Noelia J. Kunzevitzky United States
K. Esaki Japan
James S. Novak United States
Keisuke Kosaki Japan
Julian Schofield relative to Takahito Niiyama Japan Takahito Niiyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Takahito Niiyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julian Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Schofield. The network helps show where Julian Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julian Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julian Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Julian Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199583
2 199064
3 199562
4 199357
5 199650
6 199537
7 200226
8 199622
9 200021
10 200317
11 200410
12 199910
13 199210
14 19959
15 20008
16 20186
17 20073
18 20122
19 20112
20 20102

About Julian Schofield

Julian Schofield is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (10 papers), Economic Sanctions and International Relations (5 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (4 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (3 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (42 citations), Molecular Biology (330 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (66 citations), Genetics (94 citations) and Physiology (82 citations). Julian Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yvonne H. Edwards, Lewis Wolpert, Ian N.M. Day, Kay E. Davies, Dariusz C. Górecki, Derek J. Blake, Thomas W. Rademacher, Margaret Buckingham, Denis Houzelstein and T. W. Rademacher. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Dynamics, Genomics, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Mechanisms of Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact