Julian Lock

885 citations
17 papers · 639 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Julian Lock

15 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Julian Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Condensed Matter Physics 511
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 218
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 225
  • Geophysics 64
  • General Materials Science 12
Replace L. Rinderer with:
L. Rinderer Switzerland
A R de Vroomen Netherlands
B. M�hlschlegel Germany
A. S. Joseph India
S. Hörnfeldt Sweden
L.W. Roeland Netherlands
C. M. Muirhead United Kingdom
L. Y. L. Shen United States
A. C. Mota Switzerland
J. D. Gavenda United States
Julian Lock relative to L. Rinderer Switzerland L. Rinderer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L. Rinderer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julian Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Lock. The network helps show where Julian Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Julian Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julian Lock Line = papers co-authored together Julian Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1973280
2 1957105
3 195187
4 195146
5 196936
6 195730
7 196617
8 195716
9 19585
10 19594
11 19624
12 19633
13 19573
14 19621
15 19611
16 19641
17 19960

About Julian Lock

Julian Lock is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (2 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (2 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (2 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (511 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (218 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (225 citations), Geophysics (64 citations) and General Materials Science (12 citations). Julian Lock has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. B. Pippard, D. Shoenberg, F. A. Johnson and David H. Parkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Cryogenics, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Reports on Progress in Physics, History and Solid-State Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact