Julian Johnson

425 total citations
14 papers, 112 citations indexed

About

Julian Johnson is a scholar working on Music, Literature and Literary Theory and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Julian Johnson has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 112 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Music, 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Julian Johnson's work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (11 papers), French Literature and Poetry (3 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (3 papers). Julian Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Musicology and Musical Analysis (11 papers), French Literature and Poetry (3 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (3 papers). Julian Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Julian Johnson's co-authors include Max Paddison, Nicholas Mathew, Rodney Livingstone, Edmund Jephcott, Theodor W. Adorno, Suzannah Clark, Scott Burnham, Mary Ann Smart, Benjamin Walton and James Webster and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Modern Language Quarterly and Music Analysis.

In The Last Decade

Julian Johnson

13 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julian Johnson United Kingdom	6	83	27	20	18	13	14	112
Karol Berger United States	6	76 0.9×	23 0.9×	11 0.6×	24 1.3×	12 0.9×	23	108
Scott Burnham United States	9	128 1.5×	47 1.7×	21 1.1×	17 0.9×	14 1.1×	29	163
Judith Tick United States	6	97 1.2×	7 0.3×	19 0.9×	16 0.9×	7 0.5×	19	140
Robert Fink United States	7	69 0.8×	14 0.5×	17 0.8×	7 0.4×	5 0.4×	19	121
Claudia Gorbman United States	5	46 0.6×	11 0.4×	15 0.8×	22 1.2×	23 1.8×	15	112
Jim Samson United Kingdom	8	137 1.7×	48 1.8×	23 1.1×	17 0.9×	13 1.0×	35	184
Max Paddison United Kingdom	7	138 1.7×	23 0.9×	46 2.3×	18 1.0×	19 1.5×	14	194
Neal Zaslaw United States	8	91 1.1×	19 0.7×	13 0.7×	27 1.5×	10 0.8×	45	155
Emily I. Dolan United States	6	78 0.9×	23 0.9×	11 0.6×	10 0.6×	13 1.0×	12	127
Peter Szendy France	5	41 0.5×	9 0.3×	14 0.7×	13 0.7×	12 0.9×	39	120

Countries citing papers authored by Julian Johnson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Johnson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Johnson. The network helps show where Julian Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julian Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julian Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julian Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julian Johnson. Julian Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Johnson, Julian. (2017). Present Absence: Debussy, Song, and the Art of (Dis)appearing. 19th-Century Music. 40(3). 239–256. 1 indexed citations

2.

Johnson, Julian. (2014). Rehearing Lost Time: Proust and Mahler. Romance Studies. 32(2). 88–98.

3.

Mathew, Nicholas, Nicholas Mathew, Nicholas Mathew, et al.. (2013). The Invention of Beethoven and Rossini. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations

4.

Johnson, Julian. (2011). The Breaking of the Voice. Nineteenth-Century Music Review. 8(2). 179–195. 1 indexed citations

5.

Johnson, Julian. (2009). Mahler's Voices: Expression and Irony in the Songs and Symphonies. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 16 indexed citations

6.

Johnson, Julian. (2009). Mahler's Voices. Oxford University Press eBooks. 10 indexed citations

7.

Johnson, Julian. (2002). Who Needs Classical Music?. Oxford University Press eBooks. 48 indexed citations

8.

Johnson, Julian, et al.. (2000). Webern and the Transformation of Nature. Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap. 54. 342–342. 9 indexed citations

9.

Johnson, Julian. (1998). The Nature of Abstraction: Analysis and the Webern Myth. Music Analysis. 17(3). 267–267. 2 indexed citations

10.

Johnson, Julian & Max Paddison. (1995). Analysis in Adorno's Aesthetics of Music. Music Analysis. 14(2/3). 295–295. 5 indexed citations

11.

Johnson, Julian, Theodor W. Adorno, Edmund Jephcott, & Rodney Livingstone. (1995). Mahler: A Musical Physiognomy. Music Analysis. 14(1). 112–112. 5 indexed citations

12.

Johnson, Julian. (1994). The Status of the Subject in Mahler's Ninth Symphony. 19th-Century Music. 18(2). 108–120. 6 indexed citations

13.

Johnson, Julian. (1991). MUSIC IN HEGEL'S AESTHETICS: A RE-EVALUATION. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 31(2). 152–162. 1 indexed citations

14.

Johnson, Julian. (1974). Satires against Man: The Poems of Rochester. Modern Language Quarterly. 35(4). 426–428. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact