Amnon Amit

3.2k total citations
31 papers, 739 citations indexed

About

Amnon Amit is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amnon Amit has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 739 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 9 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Amnon Amit's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (15 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers). Amnon Amit is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (15 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers). Amnon Amit collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Amnon Amit's co-authors include Beth Y. Karlan, Tamar Safra, Mark Wickens, James Carmichael, Elizabeth Lowe, Joo Ern Ang, Jan Lubiński, Katherine M. Bell‐McGuinn, Ursula A. Matulonis and Bella Kaufman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Amnon Amit

28 papers receiving 717 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amnon Amit Israel 10 408 328 237 131 122 31 739
Alessandro Bovicelli Italy 18 221 0.5× 241 0.7× 165 0.7× 68 0.5× 351 2.9× 38 749
Ming-Chieh Lin Taiwan 18 153 0.4× 161 0.5× 242 1.0× 39 0.3× 130 1.1× 35 706
Kenji Umayahara Japan 16 129 0.3× 287 0.9× 164 0.7× 85 0.6× 404 3.3× 41 828
Natalie Banet United States 11 135 0.3× 84 0.3× 152 0.6× 51 0.4× 56 0.5× 33 519
N. Vavra Austria 15 146 0.4× 346 1.1× 88 0.4× 64 0.5× 238 2.0× 80 668
Marie‐Aude Lefrère‐Belda France 10 139 0.3× 144 0.4× 387 1.6× 59 0.5× 83 0.7× 12 817
E Kučera Austria 15 164 0.4× 169 0.5× 210 0.9× 42 0.3× 244 2.0× 40 686
Yasunori Hashiguchi Japan 14 229 0.6× 196 0.6× 236 1.0× 46 0.4× 88 0.7× 37 549
Steven Piver United States 15 119 0.3× 323 1.0× 145 0.6× 92 0.7× 232 1.9× 25 682
George Vlahos Greece 12 274 0.7× 241 0.7× 182 0.8× 20 0.2× 111 0.9× 22 663

Countries citing papers authored by Amnon Amit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amnon Amit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amnon Amit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amnon Amit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amnon Amit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amnon Amit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amnon Amit. The network helps show where Amnon Amit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amnon Amit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amnon Amit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amnon Amit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amnon Amit. Amnon Amit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yousef, Yacoub A., et al.. (2025). Timing matters: Surgery-to-chemotherapy interval and outcomes in ovarian cancer. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 315. 114772–114772.
2.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2023). Fourier transformation based texture analysis for differentiating between hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas. Microscopy Research and Technique. 86(4). 473–480.
3.
Abdah‐Bortnyak, Roxolyana, et al.. (2022). [F18]FDG PET/CT-Derived Metabolic and Volumetric Biomarkers Can Predict Response to Treatment in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients. Cancers. 14(18). 4382–4382. 2 indexed citations
4.
Perri, Tamar, Gabriel Levin, Limor Helpman, et al.. (2021). Minimally invasive approach in endometrial cancer with lower uterine segment involvement in stage ≥ II: A retrospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 268. 43–47. 1 indexed citations
5.
6.
Gemer, Ofer, Ram Eitan, Oded Raban, et al.. (2020). Increased ultrasonographic endometrial thickness is associated with poor survival in patients with endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(5). 1098–1102.
7.
Gemer, Ofer, Limor Helpman, Ram Eitan, et al.. (2019). The oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 243. 120–124. 15 indexed citations
8.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2019). Can morphometric analysis of the fallopian tube fimbria predict the presence of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC)?. PLoS ONE. 14(2). e0211329–e0211329. 2 indexed citations
9.
Eisenberg, Elon, et al.. (2018). Magnetic Resonance–Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Bone Metastasis: From Pain Palliation to Biological Ablation?. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 56(1). 158–162. 5 indexed citations
10.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2017). The role of F18-FDG PET/CT in predicting secondary optimal de-bulking in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Surgical Oncology. 26(4). 347–351. 7 indexed citations
11.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of Microscopic Changes in Fallopian Tubes of BRCA Mutation Carriers by Morphometric Analysis of Histologic Slides: A Preliminary Pilot Study. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 37(5). 460–467. 2 indexed citations
12.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2013). FDG PET/CT in monitoring response to treatment in gynecological malignancies. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 25(1). 17–22. 24 indexed citations
13.
Keidar, Zohar, et al.. (2013). To operate or to radiate: the added value of the maximal standardized uptake value in PET–FDG in cervical cancer patients. Medical Oncology. 30(2). 558–558. 5 indexed citations
14.
Kaye, Stanley B., Louis Fehrenbacher, Robert W. Holloway, et al.. (2012). A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Vismodegib as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer in Second or Third Complete Remission. Clinical Cancer Research. 18(23). 6509–6518. 102 indexed citations
15.
Amit, Amnon, et al.. (2012). Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 286(4). 983–988. 35 indexed citations
17.
Amit, Amnon, Julian C. Schink, Ari Reiss, & Lior Löwenstein. (2011). PET/CT in Gynecologic Cancer: Present Applications and Future Prospects—A Clinician’s Perspective. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 38(1). 1–21. 21 indexed citations
19.
Bronshtein, Moshe, et al.. (1994). The early prenatal sonographic diagnosis of renal agenesis: Techniques and possible pitfalls. Prenatal Diagnosis. 14(4). 291–297. 32 indexed citations
20.
Blumenfeld, Zeev, Martha Dirnfeld, H Abramovici, et al.. (1992). Spontaneous fetal reduction in multiple gestations assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 99(4). 333–337. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026