Julia Strauß

520 total citations
9 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Julia Strauß is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Strauß has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Julia Strauß's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers). Julia Strauß is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers). Julia Strauß collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Julia Strauß's co-authors include Gritta Janka, Christian Becker, Andrea Maul‐Pavicic, Julia Pagel, Karin Beutel, Jan Rohr, Gillian M. Griffiths, Stephan Ehl, Hans Christian Hennies and Udo zur Stadt and has published in prestigious journals such as Oncogene, Endocrinology and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Julia Strauß

7 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Strauß Germany	4	228	209	120	60	42	9	346
Maria Luisa Coniglio Italy	9	168 0.7×	168 0.8×	89 0.7×	42 0.7×	8 0.2×	19	279
Benedetta Ciambotti Italy	7	183 0.8×	157 0.8×	102 0.8×	27 0.5×	10 0.2×	7	248
F.M. Almazán-Fernández Spain	9	71 0.3×	90 0.4×	51 0.4×	66 1.1×	15 0.4×	35	306
Sylvia Kamphuis Netherlands	8	98 0.4×	222 1.1×	25 0.2×	271 4.5×	42 1.0×	14	436
Zhili Jin China	8	128 0.6×	122 0.6×	67 0.6×	30 0.5×	7 0.2×	20	205
Peifang Xiao China	6	121 0.5×	50 0.2×	47 0.4×	28 0.5×	3 0.1×	41	175
Thomas N. Burn United States	9	66 0.3×	228 1.1×	44 0.4×	63 1.1×	8 0.2×	15	329
Maddalena Migliavacca Italy	10	130 0.6×	152 0.7×	27 0.2×	72 1.2×	5 0.1×	12	308
C Herbelin France	6	175 0.8×	86 0.4×	46 0.4×	134 2.2×	1 0.0×	9	311
Sharat Chandra United States	11	218 1.0×	175 0.8×	63 0.5×	31 0.5×	3 0.1×	37	343

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Strauß

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Strauß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Strauß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Strauß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Strauß

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Strauß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Strauß. The network helps show where Julia Strauß may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Strauß

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Strauß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Strauß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Strauß. Julia Strauß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Bell, Christopher J., Hanna Kern, Christof Rickert, et al.. (2025). Specific presynaptic functions require distinct Drosophila Cav2 splice isoforms. eLife. 13. 1 indexed citations

Strauß, Julia, Gerrit Wolters‐Eisfeld, Peter Nollau, et al.. (2025). Memory-like Natural Killer Cell and CD19 Antibody–Based Immunotherapy in Combination with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Has Antitumor Effects against Ph(-like) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Immunology Research. 13(6). 881–896. 1 indexed citations

Spohn, Michael, et al.. (2025). A case report of a pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a subclonal GCC2::PDGFRB t(2;5) translocation – implementation for the selection of MRD-targets. Leukemia & lymphoma. 66(8). 1526–1530.

Bell, Christopher J., Hanna Kern, Christof Rickert, et al.. (2024). Specific presynaptic functions require distinct Drosophila Cav2 splice isoforms. eLife. 13.

Iglesias, Pablo, Julia Strauß, Ann‐Christin Puller, et al.. (2019). Lineage-specific control of TFIIH by MITF determines transcriptional homeostasis and DNA repair. Oncogene. 38(19). 3616–3635. 14 indexed citations

Strauß, Julia, et al.. (2012). Leukemia-associated mutations in SHIP1 inhibit its enzymatic activity, interaction with the GM-CSF receptor and Grb2, and its ability to inactivate PI3K/AKT signaling. Cellular Signalling. 24(11). 2095–2101. 28 indexed citations

Stadt, Udo zur, Jan Rohr, Wenke Seifert, et al.. (2009). Familial Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Type 5 (FHL-5) Is Caused by Mutations in Munc18-2 and Impaired Binding to Syntaxin 11. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 85(4). 482–492. 284 indexed citations

Tébib, Jacques, Serge Aho, Christophe Michiels, et al.. (1993). [Bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Apropos of 22 cases].. PubMed. 60(12). 907–12. 2 indexed citations

Colton, Timothy J., et al.. (1978). Comparison of Luteolytic Potencies of Aminoglutethimide Enantiomers in the Rabbit and Rat*. Endocrinology. 103(5). 1605–1610. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact