Julia Shand
- Molecular Biology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Co-authors
- J. N. LythgoeJulian C. PartridgeNathan S. HartNicole ThomasShaun P. CollinL.D. BeazleySN ArcherCatherine A. Arrese
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (15 papers)Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julia Shand
46 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Molecular Biology 684
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 622
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 564
- Ecology 449
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 365
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shand
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shand more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shand
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shand. The network helps show where Julia Shand may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Shand
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Shand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Shand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Shand. Julia Shand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 120 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 65 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | Developmental changes in the visual pigments of black bream | 1 |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Transient ipsilateral projections in a developing teleost is related to the relocation of the area centralis | 1 |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | Mechanisms for changing the position of the area centralis in a retina that undergoes continual growth | 2 |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 140 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Julia Shand
Julia Shand is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (15 papers) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (622 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (564 citations) and Aquatic Science (173 citations). Julia Shand has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. N. Lythgoe, Julian C. Partridge, Nathan S. Hart, Nicole Thomas, Shaun P. Collin, L.D. Beazley, SN Archer, Catherine A. Arrese, W. R. A. Muntz and DM Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Journal of Physiology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.