Julia Pemberton

48 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Julia Pemberton
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Urology 243
  • Library and Information Sciences 29
  • Emergency Medicine 134
  • Emergency Medical Services 97
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 254
Replace Kristin Chrouser with:
Kristin Chrouser United States
Andrew E. MacNeily Canada
David H. Rothstein United States
Jamie E. Anderson United States
Jim Chalmers United Kingdom
Richard Carmona United States
Katrien Oude Rengerink Netherlands
Liyi Cen United States
Chester J. Donnally United States
Clifford F. Melick United States
Julia Pemberton relative to Kristin Chrouser United States Kristin Chrouser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Kristin Chrouser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Pemberton. The network helps show where Julia Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Pemberton Line = papers co-authored together Julia Pemberton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968145
2 201288
3 201161
4 201550
5 201348
6
A Search for Core Values: Towards a Model Code of Ethics for Information Professionals.
200045
7 201143
8 201539
9 201437
10 201335
11 201233
12 201425
13 201225
14 201425
15 201525
16 201724
17 201524
18 201424
19 201023
20 199221

About Julia Pemberton

Julia Pemberton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (7 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (5 papers), Global Health and Surgery (5 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (243 citations), Library and Information Sciences (29 citations), Emergency Medicine (134 citations), Emergency Medical Services (97 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (254 citations). Julia Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Guyana. Frequent co-authors include Luis H. Braga, Armando J. Lorenzo, Forough Farrokhyar, Hélène Flageole, Jorge DeMaria, Brian H. Cameron, Dan Poenaru, Wallace Koehler, J. Mark Walton and Claudia Frankfurter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, The Journal of Urology, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Pediatric Urology and Journal of Education for Library and Information Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact