Julia Hörnle

428 citations
31 papers · 181 indexed · h-index 10

Julia Hörnle

24 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers

Julia Hörnle
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Health Informatics 22
  • Law 41
  • Strategy and Management 50
  • Clinical Psychology 49
  • Political Science and International Relations 49
Replace Catherine M. Sharkey with:
Catherine M. Sharkey United States
David H. McElreath United States
Steven J. Burton United States
Alain Strowel Belgium
Shauhin A. Talesh United States
Federico Ferretti United Kingdom
Jackie Harvey United Kingdom
Horst Eidenmueller United Kingdom
Robert A. Hillman United States
Songül Tolan Spain
Julia Hörnle relative to Catherine M. Sharkey United States Catherine M. Sharkey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.5×
Catherine M. Sharkey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hörnle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hörnle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hörnle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hörnle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hörnle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hörnle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hörnle. The network helps show where Julia Hörnle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Julia Hörnle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Hörnle Line = papers co-authored together Julia Hörnle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 20191
3 201930
4 20198
5 20191
6 201812
7 20170
8 20150
9
Encouraging online alternative dispute Resolution in the EU and beyond
20133
10 20129
11 20110
12 20100
13
The Changing Face of Electronic Consumer Contracts In the 21st Century: Fit for Purpose?
20090
14
Legal Controls on the Use of Arbitration Clause in B2C e-Commerce Contracts
20091
15 200917
16 20040
17
Online Dispute Resolution in Business to Consumer E-commerce Transactions.
200212
18 20023
19
Disputes Solved in Cyberspace and the Rule of Law.
20012
20
The European Union Takes Initiative in the Field of E-Commerce.
20001

About Julia Hörnle

Julia Hörnle is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (9 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (7 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), European and International Contract Law (4 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers), Diverse Legal and Medical Studies (3 papers) and International Arbitration and Investment Law (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (22 citations), Law (41 citations) and Strategy and Management (50 citations). Julia Hörnle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Wang Hon, Christopher J. Millard, Christopher Millard and Gareth Tyson. Their work appears in journals such as International and Comparative Law Quarterly, International Review of Law Computers & Technology and Information & Communications Technology Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026