Julia Hörnle
- Strategy and Management
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Law top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (9 papers)Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (7 papers)Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers)
- Journals
- International and Comparative Law QuarterlyInternational Review of Law Computers & TechnologyInformation & Communications Technology Law
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Julia Hörnle
24 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Strategy and Management 50
- Political Science and International Relations 49
- Clinical Psychology 49
- Law 41
- Sociology and Political Science 40
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hörnle
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hörnle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hörnle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hörnle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hörnle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hörnle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hörnle. The network helps show where Julia Hörnle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Hörnle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Hörnle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Hörnle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Hörnle. Julia Hörnle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Encouraging online alternative dispute Resolution in the EU and beyond | 3 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | The Changing Face of Electronic Consumer Contracts In the 21st Century: Fit for Purpose? | 0 |
| 14 | Legal Controls on the Use of Arbitration Clause in B2C e-Commerce Contracts | 1 |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Online Dispute Resolution in Business to Consumer E-commerce Transactions. | 12 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Disputes Solved in Cyberspace and the Rule of Law. | 2 |
| 20 | The European Union Takes Initiative in the Field of E-Commerce. | 1 |
About Julia Hörnle
Julia Hörnle is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (9 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (7 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (22 citations), Law (41 citations) and Strategy and Management (50 citations). Julia Hörnle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Wang Hon, Christopher J. Millard, Christopher Millard and Gareth Tyson. Their work appears in journals such as International and Comparative Law Quarterly, International Review of Law Computers & Technology and Information & Communications Technology Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.