Julia García-Escalera
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 10
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 4
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 4
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Stress and Burnout Research 4
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 3
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 5
- Mental Health Research Topics 4
- Education top 10%
- Early Childhood Education and Development 3
- Co-authors
- Paloma ChorotRosa M. ValienteBonifacio SandínJill Ehrenreich‐MayA. Fernandez PrietoDaniel M. CampagneSandra ArnáezSarah M. Kennedy
- Journals
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (1 paper)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julia García-Escalera
17 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Clinical Psychology 411
- Applied Psychology 78
- Social Psychology 205
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 122
- Education 91
Countries citing papers authored by Julia García-Escalera
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia García-Escalera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia García-Escalera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia García-Escalera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia García-Escalera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia García-Escalera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia García-Escalera. The network helps show where Julia García-Escalera may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Julia García-Escalera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 197 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 22 |
About Julia García-Escalera
Julia García-Escalera is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (411 citations), Applied Psychology (78 citations) and Social Psychology (205 citations). Julia García-Escalera has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paloma Chorot, Rosa M. Valiente, Bonifacio Sandín, Jill Ehrenreich‐May, A. Fernandez Prieto, Daniel M. Campagne, Sandra Arnáez, Sarah M. Kennedy and David Pineda. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.