Julia Fox

740 total citations
20 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Julia Fox is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Fox has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 5 papers in Communication and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Julia Fox's work include Media Influence and Health (11 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers) and Humor Studies and Applications (4 papers). Julia Fox is often cited by papers focused on Media Influence and Health (11 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers) and Humor Studies and Applications (4 papers). Julia Fox collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Singapore. Julia Fox's co-authors include Annie Lang, Byungho Park, Michael A. Shapiro, Deborah Potter, Yongkuk Chung, Nancy Schwartz, Seung‐Whan Lee, Jonathan Smith, Michael Hurwitz and Joshua Goodman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Communication, Communication Research and Human Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Julia Fox

18 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Fox United States	11	193	153	124	107	66	20	497
Jatin Srivastava United States	9	79 0.4×	244 1.6×	49 0.4×	44 0.4×	7 0.1×	12	389
Mun‐Young Chung United States	7	158 0.8×	236 1.5×	49 0.4×	95 0.9×	39 0.6×	15	431
Edward Downs United States	11	134 0.7×	275 1.8×	60 0.5×	98 0.9×	175 2.7×	24	557
Rosa Mikeal Martey United States	9	64 0.3×	185 1.2×	29 0.2×	52 0.5×	49 0.7×	22	337
Fred W. Sanborn United States	10	75 0.4×	90 0.6×	43 0.3×	73 0.7×	52 0.8×	11	250
Barry S. Sapolsky United States	15	94 0.5×	137 0.9×	198 1.6×	123 1.1×	156 2.4×	25	486
Richard Frost United States	10	212 1.1×	154 1.0×	111 0.9×	32 0.3×	30 0.5×	20	466
Jennifer Brown United States	7	53 0.3×	115 0.8×	31 0.3×	41 0.4×	56 0.8×	7	364
Brendan Keogh Australia	12	45 0.2×	282 1.8×	19 0.2×	19 0.2×	56 0.8×	34	449
Jung-Yoon Yum South Korea	6	44 0.2×	457 3.0×	107 0.9×	46 0.4×	17 0.3×	16	533

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Fox

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Fox

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Fox. The network helps show where Julia Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Fox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Fox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Fox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Fox. Julia Fox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fox, Julia. (2024). Spring of folly: A content analysis of television political satire in the spring of 2020. The Communication Review. 27(3). 293–306.

Camp, L. Jean, et al.. (2023). An Argument for Linguistic Expertise in Cyberthreat Analysis: LOLSec in Russian Language eCrime Landscape. 2 indexed citations

Fox, Julia, et al.. (2023). Cervical cancer during the covid pandemic: Are patients presenting with more advanced or larger tumours?. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 283. 95–99.

Fox, Julia. (2022). Funny You Mention It: A Synthesis of Published Research on Learning from Comedic Versus Serious News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 66(4). 674–697. 2 indexed citations

Fox, Julia. (2020). Irony and outrage: The polarized landscape of rage, fear, and laughter in the United States. Journal of Communication. 71(3). E29–E31. 4 indexed citations

Fox, Julia, et al.. (2019). News You Can’t Use: Jon Stewart’s Daily Show Media Critiques. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 97(1). 235–256. 5 indexed citations

Goodman, Joshua, Michael Hurwitz, Jonathan Smith, & Julia Fox. (2016). Reprint of “The relationship between siblings’ college choices: Evidence from one million SAT-taking families”. Economics of Education Review. 51. 125–135. 2 indexed citations

Fox, Julia, Syed Hossainy, Richard Rapoza, & Patrick W. Serruys. (2015). Technology limitations of BRS in bifurcations. EuroIntervention. 11(V). V155–V158. 6 indexed citations

Goodman, Joshua, Michael Hurwitz, Jonathan Smith, & Julia Fox. (2015). The relationship between siblings’ college choices: Evidence from one million SAT-taking families. Economics of Education Review. 48. 75–85. 30 indexed citations

10.

Fox, Julia, et al.. (2013). Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions. Acute Cardiac Care. 15(1). 1–6. 45 indexed citations

11.

Bailey, Rachel L., Julia Fox, & Maria Elizabeth Grabe. (2013). The Influence of Message and Audience Characteristics on TV News Grazing Behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 57(3). 318–337. 13 indexed citations

12.

Wise, Kevin, et al.. (2008). Responding to Change on TV: How Viewer-Controlled Changes in Content Differ From Programmed Changes in Content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 52(2). 182–199. 8 indexed citations

13.

Fox, Julia, et al.. (2007). No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Presidential Election Campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 51(2). 213–227. 107 indexed citations

14.

Chock, T. Makana, et al.. (2007). Telling Me Quickly. Communication Research. 34(6). 618–636. 17 indexed citations

15.

Fox, Julia, Byungho Park, & Annie Lang. (2007). When Available Resources Become Negative Resources. Communication Research. 34(3). 277–296. 89 indexed citations

16.

Fox, Julia & Byungho Park. (2006). The "I" of Embedded Reporting: An Analysis of CNN Coverage of the "Shock and Awe" Campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 50(1). 36–51. 12 indexed citations

17.

Fox, Julia, et al.. (2005). Hype Versus Substance in Network Television Coverage of Presidential Election Campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 82(1). 97–109. 13 indexed citations

18.

Fox, Julia. (2004). A Signal Detection Analysis of Audio/Video Redundancy Effects in Television News Video. Communication Research. 31(5). 524–536. 53 indexed citations

19.

Fox, Julia, Annie Lang, Yongkuk Chung, et al.. (2004). Picture This: Effects of Graphics on the Processing of Television News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 48(4). 646–674. 54 indexed citations

20.

Shapiro, Michael A. & Julia Fox. (2002). The Role of Typical and Atypical Events in Story Memory. Human Communication Research. 28(1). 109–135. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact