Julia Draf

596 total citations
8 papers, 269 citations indexed

About

Julia Draf is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Draf has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 269 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sensory Systems, 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 5 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Julia Draf's work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers). Julia Draf is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers). Julia Draf collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Julia Draf's co-authors include Thomas Hummel, Antje Haehner, Katja de With, Sarah Dräger, Serge D. Le Bon, Constantin A. Hintschich, Caroline Huart, Ludger Klimek, Eleonora M. C. Trecca and Aytuğ Altundağ and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, The Laryngoscope and Chemical Senses.

In The Last Decade

Julia Draf

8 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Draf Germany	7	226	164	101	81	30	8	269
Vicente A Ramirez United States	6	200 0.9×	165 1.0×	123 1.2×	54 0.7×	19 0.6×	8	267
Sophie S. Jang United States	9	169 0.7×	91 0.6×	51 0.5×	56 0.7×	28 0.9×	19	275
Riley D Herriman United States	4	161 0.7×	130 0.8×	67 0.7×	53 0.7×	18 0.6×	5	196
Özlem Saatçi Türkiye	8	212 0.9×	123 0.8×	44 0.4×	163 2.0×	43 1.4×	14	325
Serge D. Le Bon Belgium	9	165 0.7×	90 0.5×	47 0.5×	50 0.6×	30 1.0×	11	271
Marco Cucurullo Italy	5	136 0.6×	94 0.6×	49 0.5×	98 1.2×	18 0.6×	8	235
Andrea D’Alessandro Italy	4	162 0.7×	109 0.7×	43 0.4×	128 1.6×	45 1.5×	7	251
Keiland W Cooper United States	4	185 0.8×	123 0.8×	82 0.8×	112 1.4×	54 1.8×	9	315
Leonardo Calvanese Italy	6	179 0.8×	118 0.7×	56 0.6×	95 1.2×	29 1.0×	14	269
Thirza Singer‐Cornelius Switzerland	5	190 0.8×	121 0.7×	46 0.5×	147 1.8×	54 1.8×	5	307

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Draf

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Draf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Draf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Draf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Draf

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Draf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Draf. The network helps show where Julia Draf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Draf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Draf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Draf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Draf. Julia Draf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Jetté, Marie E., Mei Li, Vijay R. Ramakrishnan, et al.. (2023). Variability in P2X receptor composition in human taste nerves: implications for treatment of chronic cough. ERJ Open Research. 9(2). 7–2023. 8 indexed citations

2.

Haehner, Antje, Julia Draf, Giancarlo Ottaviano, et al.. (2022). Parosmia as a predictor of a better olfactory function in COVID-19: a multicentric longitudinal study for upper respiratory tract infections. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 280(5). 2331–2340. 18 indexed citations

3.

Draf, Julia, et al.. (2022). Smell, taste and trigeminal function: similarities and differences between results from home tests and examinations in the clinic.. PubMed. 60(4). 293–300. 7 indexed citations

4.

Draf, Julia, Caroline Huart, Constantin A. Hintschich, et al.. (2021). COVID‐19: Recovery from Chemosensory Dysfunction. A Multicentre study on Smell and Taste. The Laryngoscope. 131(5). 1095–1100. 81 indexed citations

5.

Draf, Julia, et al.. (2021). Perceived utility of electronic noses in patients with loss of smell. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 278(6). 2155–2156. 2 indexed citations

6.

Biswas, Kristi, et al.. (2020). Loss of bacterial diversity in the sinuses is associated with lower smell discrimination scores. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 16422–16422. 10 indexed citations

7.

Haehner, Antje, Julia Draf, Sarah Dräger, Katja de With, & Thomas Hummel. (2020). Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19. ORL. 82(4). 175–180. 110 indexed citations

8.

Oleszkiewicz, Anna, et al.. (2019). Quality of Life in Patients With Olfactory Loss Is Better Predicted by Flavor Identification Than by Orthonasal Olfactory Function. Chemical Senses. 44(6). 371–377. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact