Julia Dieter
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Papers in
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 6
-
- Mind wandering and attention 3
- Co-authors
- Falk Kiefer (6 shared papers)Karl Mann (6 shared papers)Tagrid Leménager (6 shared papers)Iris Reinhard (5 shared papers)Sabine Hoffmann (3 shared papers)Sabine Vollstädt‐Klein (4 shared papers)Holger Hill (4 shared papers)Daniela Mier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Behavioral Addictions (2 papers)Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)Assessment (1 paper)European Psychiatry (1 paper)Behavioural Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julia Dieter
10 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Applied Psychology 46
- Sociology and Political Science 214
- Cognitive Neuroscience 80
- Clinical Psychology 87
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Dieter
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Dieter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Dieter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Dieter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Dieter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Dieter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Dieter. The network helps show where Julia Dieter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Julia Dieter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 |
About Julia Dieter
Julia Dieter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 10 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Mind wandering and attention (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Sociology and Political Science (214 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations). Julia Dieter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Falk Kiefer, Karl Mann, Tagrid Leménager, Iris Reinhard, Sabine Hoffmann, Sabine Vollstädt‐Klein, Holger Hill, Daniela Mier, Anne Koopmann and Christine M. Freitag. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Behavioral Neuroscience, Assessment, European Psychiatry and Behavioural Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.