Julia Deakin

1.9k citations
23 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Deakin

23 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Julia Deakin
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • General Decision Sciences 76
  • Biological Psychiatry 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 371
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 232
  • Pharmacy 83
Replace Lena Rademacher with:
Lena Rademacher Germany
Katja N. Spreckelmeyer Germany
Lisiane Bizarro Brazil
Margaret C. Wardle United States
Trevor Steward Spain
Dominic S. Fareri United States
Theresa Teslovich United States
Michael Hardin United States
Erika J. Ruberry United States
Esther Fujiwara Canada
Julia Deakin relative to Lena Rademacher Germany Lena Rademacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Lena Rademacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Deakin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Deakin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Deakin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Deakin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Deakin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Deakin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Deakin. The network helps show where Julia Deakin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Deakin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Deakin Line = papers co-authored together Julia Deakin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20229
2 20216
3 20212
4 202094
5 20207
6 202012
7 20207
8 20201
9 201913
10 201863
11 201769
12 201640
13 2015186
14 201366
15 20093
16 200732
17 2005163
18 2004237
19 200439
20 2004151

About Julia Deakin

Julia Deakin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacy, General Decision Sciences, Biological Psychiatry and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (76 citations), Biological Psychiatry (59 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (371 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (232 citations) and Pharmacy (83 citations). Julia Deakin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Sahakian, Trevor W. Robbins, Michael R. F. Aitken, Peter J. Nestor, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Belinda Lennox, Richard A. I. Bethlehem, Bonnie Auyeung, Michael Lombardo and A Sule. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Translational Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026