Judith Kappesser

686 total citations
19 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Judith Kappesser is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith Kappesser has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Judith Kappesser's work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers). Judith Kappesser is often cited by papers focused on Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers). Judith Kappesser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Romania. Judith Kappesser's co-authors include Amanda C de C Williams, Kenneth M. Prkachin, Stefan Lautenbacher, Christiane Hermann, Wilco P. Achterberg, Cătălina Tudose, Miriam Kunz, Bettina S. Husebø, Liv Inger Strand and Frank Lobbezoo and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Judith Kappesser

16 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Judith Kappesser Germany 12 203 167 127 127 115 19 469
Tony Iezzi Canada 11 155 0.8× 101 0.6× 304 2.4× 63 0.5× 139 1.2× 22 570
Julia R. Craner United States 15 120 0.6× 91 0.5× 303 2.4× 65 0.5× 171 1.5× 36 550
Kristen E. Jastrowski Mano United States 14 69 0.3× 268 1.6× 128 1.0× 37 0.3× 100 0.9× 31 600
Alexis J. Kant United States 8 127 0.6× 274 1.6× 148 1.2× 30 0.2× 122 1.1× 12 539
Jeannie A. Sperry United States 14 142 0.7× 77 0.5× 304 2.4× 63 0.5× 182 1.6× 30 752
Rachel Atchley United States 13 215 1.1× 43 0.3× 130 1.0× 40 0.3× 87 0.8× 17 638
Karoline Vangronsveld Belgium 10 134 0.7× 76 0.5× 272 2.1× 19 0.1× 165 1.4× 11 469
Brandon N. Kyle United States 9 69 0.3× 57 0.3× 53 0.4× 77 0.6× 52 0.5× 14 335
Manuela Trapanotto Italy 7 113 0.6× 181 1.1× 73 0.6× 24 0.2× 48 0.4× 8 397
Marie Kanstrup Sweden 15 115 0.6× 326 2.0× 155 1.2× 17 0.1× 113 1.0× 27 749

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Kappesser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Kappesser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Kappesser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Kappesser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Kappesser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Kappesser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Kappesser. The network helps show where Judith Kappesser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Kappesser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Kappesser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Kappesser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Kappesser. Judith Kappesser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Kappesser, Judith & Amanda C de C Williams. (2025). Give and take: an evolutionary framework for social transactions in pain. Pain. 166(8). 1723–1728.
2.
Ehrhardt, Harald, Klaus‐Peter Zimmer, Anita Windhorst, et al.. (2024). Skin Transillumination Improves Peripheral Vein Cannulation by Residents in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology. 121(6). 733–741.
3.
Kappesser, Judith, et al.. (2024). Affective and social pain modulation in children—Experimental evidence using picture viewing. PLoS ONE. 19(12). e0313636–e0313636.
4.
Kappesser, Judith, et al.. (2021). Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective. PLoS ONE. 16(7). e0254069–e0254069. 3 indexed citations
5.
Kappesser, Judith, et al.. (2020). Placebo effect in children: the role of expectation and learning. Pain. 161(6). 1191–1201. 12 indexed citations
6.
Kappesser, Judith, et al.. (2020). Pain assessment for cognitively impaired older adults: Do items of available observer tools reflect pain‐specific responses?. European Journal of Pain. 24(4). 851–862. 7 indexed citations
7.
Kappesser, Judith. (2019). The facial expression of pain in humans considered from a social perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 374(1785). 20190284–20190284. 21 indexed citations
8.
Kappesser, Judith, Jan de Laffolie, Dirk Faas, Harald Ehrhardt, & Christiane Hermann. (2018). Comparison of two neonatal pain assessment tools (Children and Infant’s Postoperative Pain Scale and the Neonatal Facial Coding System—Revised) and their relations to clinicians’ intuitive pain estimates. European Journal of Pain. 23(4). 708–718. 10 indexed citations
9.
Kappesser, Judith, Jan de Laffolie, Dirk Faas, et al.. (2018). Pain-specific Reactions or Indicators of a General Stress Response?. Clinical Journal of Pain. 35(2). 101–110. 16 indexed citations
10.
Corbett, Anne, Wilco P. Achterberg, Bettina S. Husebø, et al.. (2014). An international road map to improve pain assessment in people with impaired cognition: the development of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC) meta-tool. BMC Neurology. 14(1). 229–229. 60 indexed citations
11.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2013). Does Vigilance to Pain Make Individuals Experts in Facial Recognition of Pain?. Pain Research and Management. 18(4). 191–196. 12 indexed citations
12.
Kappesser, Judith & Christiane Hermann. (2013). Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von chronischen Schmerzen. Psychotherapeut. 58(5). 503–517. 2 indexed citations
13.
Husebø, Bettina S., Wilco P. Achterberg, Frank Lobbezoo, et al.. (2012). Pain in patients with dementia: A review of pain assessment and treatment challenges. Norsk Epidemiologi. 22(2). 25 indexed citations
14.
Ruddere, Lies De, Liesbet Goubert, Tine Vervoort, Judith Kappesser, & Geert Crombez. (2012). Impact of being primed with social deception upon observer responses to others’ pain. Pain. 154(2). 221–226. 22 indexed citations
16.
Kappesser, Judith & Amanda C de C Williams. (2009). Pain estimation: Asking the right questions. Pain. 148(2). 184–187. 47 indexed citations
17.
Kappesser, Judith & Amanda C de C Williams. (2008). Pain judgements of patients’ relatives: examining the use of social contract theory as theoretical framework. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 31(4). 309–317. 24 indexed citations
18.
Kappesser, Judith, Amanda C de C Williams, & Kenneth M. Prkachin. (2006). Testing two accounts of pain underestimation. Pain. 124(1). 109–116. 99 indexed citations
19.
Kappesser, Judith & Amanda C de C Williams. (2002). Pain and negative emotions in the face: judgements by health care professionals. Pain. 99(1). 197–206. 93 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026