Corinna Baum

422 total citations
13 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Corinna Baum is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Corinna Baum has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Pharmacology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Corinna Baum's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers). Corinna Baum is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers). Corinna Baum collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Corinna Baum's co-authors include Stefan Lautenbacher, Claudia Huber, Edmund Keogh, Anne Martinelli, Martin Bohus, Regina Steil, Willem Kuyken, Thomas Heidenreich, Johannes Michalak and Rolf Rossaint and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychiatry Research and Journal of Pain.

In The Last Decade

Corinna Baum

11 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Corinna Baum Germany 10 129 129 115 95 63 13 299
Stéphanie Cormier Canada 7 146 1.1× 57 0.4× 120 1.0× 67 0.7× 69 1.1× 21 342
Fatanah Ramlee Malaysia 7 91 0.7× 173 1.3× 71 0.6× 53 0.6× 36 0.6× 17 291
Adrienne L. Adler-Neal United States 10 100 0.8× 54 0.4× 96 0.8× 182 1.9× 94 1.5× 12 337
Sarah E. Priddy United States 8 54 0.4× 92 0.7× 81 0.7× 166 1.7× 22 0.3× 8 274
Denise Beasley United States 2 70 0.5× 82 0.6× 89 0.8× 250 2.6× 29 0.5× 6 357
Esther F. Afolalu United Kingdom 6 98 0.8× 185 1.4× 71 0.6× 28 0.3× 43 0.7× 12 287
Tatsuyuki Arimura Japan 9 63 0.5× 60 0.5× 149 1.3× 71 0.7× 33 0.5× 17 313
Helen R. Gilpin United Kingdom 9 93 0.7× 39 0.3× 130 1.1× 64 0.7× 35 0.6× 12 269
Lin Yu United Kingdom 10 84 0.7× 62 0.5× 243 2.1× 247 2.6× 26 0.4× 21 428
Megan E. Kurth United States 12 226 1.8× 250 1.9× 69 0.6× 27 0.3× 131 2.1× 22 473

Countries citing papers authored by Corinna Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corinna Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corinna Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corinna Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corinna Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corinna Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corinna Baum. The network helps show where Corinna Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Corinna Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Corinna Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Corinna Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Corinna Baum. Corinna Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Martinelli, Anne, et al.. (2022). Attention and interpretation cognitive bias change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of bias modification paradigms. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 157. 104180–104180. 33 indexed citations
4.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2021). Hausärzteschaft und die Standortwahl – Ergebnisse einer Befragung. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement. 27(3). 131–137. 1 indexed citations
5.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2018). Attentional biases in patients suffering from unipolar depression: results of a dot probe task investigation. Psychiatry Research. 261. 325–331. 17 indexed citations
6.
Kunz, Miriam, et al.. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) in Pain-Free Samples and Samples with Acute and Chronic Pain. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 24(2). 260–271. 34 indexed citations
7.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2015). Effects of context and individual predispositions on hypervigilance to pain-cues: an ERP study. Journal of Pain Research. 8. 507–507. 9 indexed citations
8.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2013). Different Stages in Attentional Processing of Facial Expressions of Pain: A Dot-Probe Task Modification. Journal of Pain. 14(3). 223–232. 40 indexed citations
9.
Lautenbacher, Stefan, et al.. (2013). Vigilance for pain-related faces in a primary task paradigm: an ERP study. Journal of Pain Research. 6. 437–437. 11 indexed citations
10.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2013). Does Vigilance to Pain Make Individuals Experts in Facial Recognition of Pain?. Pain Research and Management. 18(4). 191–196. 12 indexed citations
11.
12.
Baum, Corinna, et al.. (2011). Prediction of Experimental Pain Sensitivity by Attention to Pain-Related Stimuli in Healthy Individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 112(3). 926–946. 43 indexed citations
13.
Baum, Corinna, Willem Kuyken, Martin Bohus, et al.. (2009). The Psychometric Properties of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Clinical Populations. Assessment. 17(2). 220–229. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stéphanie Cormier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fatanah Ramlee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adrienne L. Adler-Neal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah E. Priddy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise Beasley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Esther F. Afolalu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tatsuyuki Arimura Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Helen R. Gilpin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lin Yu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan E. Kurth
Rankless by CCL
2026