Countries citing papers authored by Juana Bretón‐López
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Juana Bretón‐López's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juana Bretón‐López with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juana Bretón‐López more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juana Bretón‐López
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juana Bretón‐López. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juana Bretón‐López. The network helps show where Juana Bretón‐López may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juana Bretón‐López
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juana Bretón‐López.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juana Bretón‐López based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Juana Bretón‐López. Juana Bretón‐López is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bretón‐López, Juana, Adriana Mira, Diana Castilla, Azucena García‐Palacios, & Cristina Botella. (2017). Revisión de aplicaciones de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en psicología clínica y de la salud en infancia y adolescencia. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes. 4(3). 11–16.4 indexed citations
10.
Herrero, Rocío, Juana Bretón‐López, Soledad Quero, et al.. (2015). Acceptability and Satisfaction of an ICT-based Training for University Teachers. Educational Technology & Society. 18(4). 498–510.7 indexed citations
11.
Fernández, María Lameiras, et al.. (2014). Conocimiento y viabilidad de uso del preservativo femenino en jóvenes universitarios españoles. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
12.
Quero, Soledad, et al.. (2014). LAS TECNOLOGÍAS DE LA INFORMACIÓN Y LA COMUNICACIÓN EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FOBIA A ANIMALES PEQUEÑOS EN LA INFANCIA. Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I). 22(2). 257–276.3 indexed citations
García‐Palacios, Azucena, et al.. (2006). Realidad virtual y tratamientos psicológicos: una revisión. Psicología conductual = behavioral psychology: Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud. 14(3). 491–510.13 indexed citations
16.
Bretón‐López, Juana & Gualberto Buela‐Casal. (2005). Evaluación del efecto de las campañas publicitarias de prevención de VIH/SIDA en adolescentes1. Psicothema. 17(4). 590–596.11 indexed citations
17.
Buela‐Casal, Gualberto, Juana Bretón‐López, María Páz Bermúdez, et al.. (2005). Imagen de la Psicología como profesión sanitaria en psicólogos españoles. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 26(91). 16–23.5 indexed citations
18.
Buela‐Casal, Gualberto, Inmaculada Teva, Juan Carlos Sierra, et al.. (2005). Imagen de la Psicología como profesiónsanitaria entre la población general. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 26(91). 30–38.6 indexed citations
19.
Bretón‐López, Juana, et al.. (2003). Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas de Psicología Clínica editadas en castellano. Psicothema. 15(4). 507–516.35 indexed citations
20.
Bretón‐López, Juana, et al.. (2003). Análisis de la productividad científica de la Psicología española a través de las tesis doctorales. Psicothema. 15(4). 595–609.39 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.