Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Liquid Jet Instability and Atomization in a Coaxial Gas Stream
2000436 citationsJuan C. Lasheras, E. J. Hopfingerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Juan C. Lasheras
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Juan C. Lasheras's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juan C. Lasheras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juan C. Lasheras more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juan C. Lasheras
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juan C. Lasheras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juan C. Lasheras. The network helps show where Juan C. Lasheras may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juan C. Lasheras
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juan C. Lasheras.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juan C. Lasheras based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Juan C. Lasheras. Juan C. Lasheras is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nigam, Vishal, et al.. (2012). Deformation of Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valves in Systole. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
Álamo, Juan C. del, et al.. (2008). The locomotion of marine and terrestrial gastropods: can the acceleration of the ventral pedal waves contribute to the generation of net propulsive forces?. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 61.1 indexed citations
14.
Bar‐Yoseph, P., et al.. (2008). Fluid Characteristics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAAs) and Its Correlation to Thrombus Formation. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 61.2 indexed citations
15.
Geindreau, Christian, et al.. (2007). Rupture Risk Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAAs). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 60.2 indexed citations
16.
Geindreau, Christian, et al.. (2006). Effects of the Transient Blood Flow-Wall Interaction on the Wall Stress Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA). Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 59.2 indexed citations
17.
Alonso‐Latorre, Baldomero, Juan C. del Álamo, Javier Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, et al.. (2006). Traction Forces exerted by crawling cells. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 59.1 indexed citations
18.
Hopfinger, E. J., et al.. (2001). Atomization of a Small Diameter Liquid Jet by a High-Speed Gas Stream. APS. 54.1 indexed citations
19.
Eastwood, Craig, Alain H. Cartellier, & Juan C. Lasheras. (1999). The Breakup Time of a Droplet in a Fully-Developed Turbulent Flow. APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts.5 indexed citations
20.
Lasheras, Juan C., et al.. (1997). Atomization of a Liquid Jet by a High Momentum Co-axial Swirling Gas Jet.. APS.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.