Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Indices of landscape pattern
19881.2k citationsR. V. O’Neill, J.R. Krummel et al.profile →
Landscape Patterns in a Disturbed Environment
1987554 citationsJ.R. Krummel, Robert H. Gardner et al.Oikosprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J.R. Krummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.R. Krummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.R. Krummel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.R. Krummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.R. Krummel. The network helps show where J.R. Krummel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.R. Krummel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.R. Krummel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.R. Krummel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.R. Krummel. J.R. Krummel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cantwell, Brian J., et al.. (2008). Using collaborative tools for energy corridor planning.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Fox, Jefferson, et al.. (1994). LAND USE AND LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN THAILAND: ASSESSING CHANGE IN THREE UPLAND WATERSHEDS SINCE 1954. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).57 indexed citations
Krummel, J.R., et al.. (1984). Locating vegetation «at risk» to air pollution: an exploration of a regional approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 18(3). 279–290.6 indexed citations
11.
Klopatek, J.M., J.R. Krummel, J. B. Mankin, & R. V. O’Neill. (1983). Theoretical approach to regional environmental conflicts. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 61(2). e69–e71.7 indexed citations
12.
Krummel, J.R., et al.. (1983). Siting field research in the western Kentucky energy development region: an exploration of a regional approach. Environmental Sciences Division, Publication No. 2089. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
13.
Delene, J.G., et al.. (1982). Technical analysis of the use of biomass for energy production. STIN. 83. 34459.1 indexed citations
14.
Mankin, J. B., J.M. Klopatek, R. V. O’Neill, & J.R. Krummel. (1981). Regional modeling approach to an energy-environment conflict. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
15.
Krummel, J.R., et al.. (1980). The economic consequences of abandoning pesticide use.. 10(3). 98–101.
16.
Krummel, J.R., J.M. Klopatek, J. B. Mankin, & R. V. O’Neill. (1980). Simulation approach to a regional resource environment conflict. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 289(28). 19364–72.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.