Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Indices of landscape pattern
19881.2k citationsMonica G. Turner, Virginia H. Dale et al.profile →
Current and Potential U.S. Corn Stover Supplies
2007380 citationsR.L. Graham, Richard Nelson et al.Agronomy Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R.L. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.L. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.L. Graham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.L. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.L. Graham. The network helps show where R.L. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.L. Graham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.L. Graham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.L. Graham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.L. Graham. R.L. Graham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walsh, Marie E., et al.. (1998). Economic Analysis of Energy Crop Production in the U.S. - Location, Quantities, Price, and Impacts on Traditional Agricultural Crops. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).15 indexed citations
10.
Graham, R.L., et al.. (1997). ORECCL - Summary of a national database on energy crop landbase, yields, and costs. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).5 indexed citations
11.
Walsh, Marie E., Dennis R. Becker, & R.L. Graham. (1996). The Conservation Reserve Program as a Means to Subsidize Bioenergy Crop Prices. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).9 indexed citations
Graham, R.L. & Marie E. Walsh. (1995). Evaluating the economic costs, benefits and tradeoffs of dedicated biomass energy systems: The importance of scale. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).3 indexed citations
15.
Downing, Maren & R.L. Graham. (1993). Evaluating a biomass resource: The TVA region-wide biomass resource assessment model. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).4 indexed citations
16.
Graham, R.L. & Maren Downing. (1993). Renewable biomass energy: Understanding regional scale environmental impacts. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).4 indexed citations
Graham, R.L., Louis R. Iverson, & Elizabeth A. J. Cook. (1987). Evaluating spatial patterns of forest productivity in a disturbed, mountainous landscape using LANDSAT data and a GIS. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.