This map shows the geographic impact of Joy Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joy Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joy Goodman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joy Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joy Goodman. The network helps show where Joy Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joy Goodman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joy Goodman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joy Goodman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joy Goodman. Joy Goodman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goodman, Joy, Patrick Langdon, P. John Clarkson, & Hua Dong. (2007). Industry Response to Inclusive Design: a Survey. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Eric, et al.. (2007). Agile Multi-Function Arrays.1 indexed citations
3.
Goodman, Joy, et al.. (2007). Involving people with disabilities: lessons from a designer-centred inclusive design competition. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.3 indexed citations
4.
Clarkson, P. John, et al.. (2006). Proceedings of the 3rd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT 2006). Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.4 indexed citations
5.
Goodman, Joy, et al.. (2006). Providing information about older and disabled users to designers. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.3 indexed citations
Goodman, Joy, et al.. (2005). Developing tools for communicating inclusive design principles. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.
10.
Goodman, Joy & Jay Lundell. (2005). HCI and the older population. Interacting with Computers. 17(6). 613–620.25 indexed citations
11.
Goodman, Joy, Phil Gray, & Stephen Brewster. (2005). Not just a matter of design: Key issues surrounding the inclusive design process. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).6 indexed citations
12.
Goodman, Joy, Stephen Brewster, & Philip Gray. (2004). Using Field Experiments to Evaluate Mobile Guides. 3(9). 200–201.42 indexed citations
13.
Goodman, Joy, Stephen Brewster, & Philip Gray. (2004). Connecting elders by facilitating mobility. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).4 indexed citations
Dickinson, Anna, et al.. (2003). Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people.. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University).65 indexed citations
18.
Goodman, Joy & Phil Gray. (2003). A Design Space for Location-Sensitive Aids for Older Users.7 indexed citations
19.
Dickinson, Anna, et al.. (2003). Domesticating technology: in-home requirements gathering with frail older people?. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University).26 indexed citations
20.
Collet, J., Jan Van Campenhout, Marc P. Y. Desmulliez, et al.. (2000). Architectural approach to the role of optics in mono and multiprocessor machines.. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.