Josse De Cat
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Guy MolenaersKaat DesloovereInge FrankiGuy VanderstraetenEveline HimpensPaul De CockHilde FeysIlse Jonkers
- Topics
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Josse De Cat
18 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Psychiatry and Mental health 400
- Neurology 240
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 141
- Clinical Psychology 127
- Rehabilitation 76
Countries citing papers authored by Josse De Cat
This map shows the geographic impact of Josse De Cat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josse De Cat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josse De Cat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josse De Cat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josse De Cat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josse De Cat. The network helps show where Josse De Cat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josse De Cat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josse De Cat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josse De Cat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josse De Cat. Josse De Cat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | An evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluating therapy effects and prognostic factors for a general and an individually defined physical therapy program in ambulant children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. | 11 |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 88 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | The reliability and validity of the Dyskinetic Measurement Scale: a new instrument to measure dystonia and choreoathetosis in cerebral palsy | 4 |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | The effect of individually defined physiotherapy program based on gait analysis after BTX-A treatment in children with CP | 1 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Josse De Cat
Josse De Cat is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Rehabilitation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (17 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (400 citations), Neurology (240 citations) and Rehabilitation (76 citations). Josse De Cat has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guy Molenaers, Kaat Desloovere, Inge Franki, Guy Vanderstraeten, Eveline Himpens, Paul De Cock, Hilde Feys, Ilse Jonkers, Paul Pauwels and Jo Nijs. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Gait & Posture and European Journal of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.