Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Josip Pečarić
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Josip Pečarić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josip Pečarić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josip Pečarić more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josip Pečarić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josip Pečarić. The network helps show where Josip Pečarić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josip Pečarić
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josip Pečarić.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josip Pečarić based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Josip Pečarić. Josip Pečarić is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Iqbal, Sajid, et al.. (2014). HARDY'S AND RELATED INEQUALITIES IN QUOTIENTS. 83(2). 195–207.1 indexed citations
8.
Zhou, Yong, Feng Jiao, & Josip Pečarić. (2013). Abstract Cauchy problem for fractional functional differential equations. Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis. 42(1). 119–136.38 indexed citations
9.
Pečarić, Josip, et al.. (2012). On Discrete Favard's and Berwald's Inequalities. Project Euclid (Cornell University). 12(2). 34–57.5 indexed citations
10.
Khan, Muhammad Adil, et al.. (2012). On Sapogov’s Extension of Cebysev's Inequality and Related Results. Thai Journal of Mathematics. 10(3). 617–633.4 indexed citations
11.
Krnić, Mario, et al.. (2011). General Hardy-Type Inequalities with Non-conjugate Exponents. Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society. 37(3). 77–108.2 indexed citations
Pečarić, Josip & Atiq Ur Rehman. (2009). Cauchy means introduced by an inequality of Levin and Steckin. East journal on approximations. 15(4). 515–524.2 indexed citations
14.
Anwar, Matloob & Josip Pečarić. (2008). Cauchy's means of Levinson type.. Journal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied Mathematics. 9(4).7 indexed citations
15.
Bakula, Milica Klaričić, Zsolt Páles, & Josip Pečarić. (2007). ON WEIGHTED L-CONJUGATE MEANS. University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen). 11(1). 65–78.5 indexed citations
16.
Pečarić, Josip, et al.. (2006). On an inequality of Gruss type. Mathematical communications. 11(2). 137–141.2 indexed citations
17.
Pečarić, Josip, et al.. (2006). On an inequality of Ostrowski type.. Journal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied Mathematics. 7(4). 323–6.18 indexed citations
18.
Pečarić, Josip, et al.. (2004). Note on Feng Qi's integral inequality.. Journal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied Mathematics. 5(3).12 indexed citations
19.
Pečarić, Josip, et al.. (2003). COMMENTS ON SOME ANALYTIC INEQUALITIES. Journal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied Mathematics. 4(1).3 indexed citations
20.
Dragomir, Sever S & Josip Pečarić. (1989). Refinements of some inequalities for isotonic functionals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.