Josephine Marriage

579 total citations
26 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Josephine Marriage is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Josephine Marriage has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Sensory Systems and 9 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Josephine Marriage's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (9 papers). Josephine Marriage is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (9 papers). Josephine Marriage collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Josephine Marriage's co-authors include Nicholas M. Barnes, Brian C. J. Moore, Deborah Vickers, José I. Alcántara, Brian C. J. Moore, Thomas Baer, B. C. J. Moore, Merle Mahon, J. I. Alcantara and Brian R. Glasberg and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Hearing Research and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Josephine Marriage

25 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Josephine Marriage United Kingdom 13 349 213 167 73 70 26 424
Melissa J. Polonenko Canada 15 509 1.5× 327 1.5× 167 1.0× 43 0.6× 114 1.6× 28 559
Abdollah Moossavi Iran 11 292 0.8× 158 0.7× 132 0.8× 25 0.3× 58 0.8× 60 400
Dani Tomlin Australia 13 575 1.6× 341 1.6× 183 1.1× 27 0.4× 137 2.0× 37 669
Musiek Fe United States 11 401 1.1× 216 1.0× 117 0.7× 20 0.3× 86 1.2× 17 476
Peggy Korczak United States 7 514 1.5× 214 1.0× 108 0.6× 31 0.4× 52 0.7× 12 565
Robert E. Jirsa United States 7 474 1.4× 223 1.0× 157 0.9× 28 0.4× 96 1.4× 8 542
Vijayalakshmi Easwar Canada 16 537 1.5× 267 1.3× 160 1.0× 100 1.4× 83 1.2× 50 581
Yones Lotfi Iran 11 259 0.7× 121 0.6× 122 0.7× 18 0.2× 50 0.7× 47 346
Stephanie L. Cute United States 7 558 1.6× 202 0.9× 220 1.3× 35 0.5× 54 0.8× 7 624
Deborah Moncrieff United States 16 566 1.6× 242 1.1× 141 0.8× 15 0.2× 199 2.8× 35 639

Countries citing papers authored by Josephine Marriage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josephine Marriage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josephine Marriage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josephine Marriage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josephine Marriage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josephine Marriage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josephine Marriage. The network helps show where Josephine Marriage may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josephine Marriage

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josephine Marriage. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josephine Marriage based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josephine Marriage. Josephine Marriage is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2023). An association between auditory responsiveness of children and duration of entertainment screen time in the early years of life. International Journal of Audiology. 63(9). 731–737. 1 indexed citations
2.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2022). Speech discrimination and word identification with a consumer-level bone-conduction headset and remote microphone for children with normal hearing. International Journal of Audiology. 62(4). 320–327. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mahon, Merle, et al.. (2019). A qualitative review of parents’ perspectives on the value of CAEP recording in influencing their acceptance of hearing devices for their child. International Journal of Audiology. 58(7). 401–407. 14 indexed citations
4.
5.
Marriage, Josephine, Deborah Vickers, Thomas Baer, Brian R. Glasberg, & Brian C. J. Moore. (2017). Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children. Ear and Hearing. 39(1). 20–31. 12 indexed citations
6.
Vickers, Deborah, et al.. (2017). Closed-Set Speech Discrimination Tests for Assessing Young Children. Ear and Hearing. 39(1). 32–41. 9 indexed citations
7.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2017). Hearing impairment in children. Paediatrics and Child Health. 27(10). 441–446. 4 indexed citations
8.
Moore, Brian C. J., et al.. (2016). Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes. Ear and Hearing. 37(4). 483–491. 7 indexed citations
9.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2016). Evaluating recommended audiometric changes to candidacy using the speech intelligibility index. Cochlear Implants International. 17(sup1). 8–12. 12 indexed citations
10.
Marriage, Josephine. (2013). Integrating Parents into the Diagnostic and Habilitation Process. Seminars in Hearing. 34(1). 3–10. 2 indexed citations
11.
Vickers, Deborah, et al.. (2013). Using Personal Response Systems to Assess Speech Perception Within the Classroom. Ear and Hearing. 34(4). 491–502. 16 indexed citations
12.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of an Aided TEN Test for Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea. Ear and Hearing. 29(3). 392–400.
13.
Moore, Brian C. J., Josephine Marriage, José I. Alcántara, & Brian R. Glasberg. (2005). Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid. International Journal of Audiology. 44(6). 345–357. 21 indexed citations
14.
Marriage, Josephine, Brian C. J. Moore, Michael A. Stone, & Thomas Baer. (2005). Effects of Three Amplification Strategies on Speech Perception by Children With Severe and Profound Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 26(1). 35–47. 23 indexed citations
15.
Marriage, Josephine, Brian C. J. Moore, & José I. Alcántara. (2004). Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users. International Journal of Audiology. 43(4). 198–210. 30 indexed citations
17.
Baer, Thomas, Brian C. J. Moore, & Josephine Marriage. (2001). Detection and intensity discrimination of brief tones as a function of duration by hearing-impaired listeners. Hearing Research. 159(1-2). 74–84. 5 indexed citations
18.
Marriage, Josephine, et al.. (2001). The reliability of the SCAN test: results from a primary school population in the UK. British Journal of Audiology. 35(3). 199–208. 24 indexed citations
19.
Moore, B. C. J., J. I. Alcantara, & Josephine Marriage. (2001). Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. British Journal of Audiology. 35(6). 339–353. 32 indexed citations
20.
Marriage, Josephine & Nicholas M. Barnes. (1995). Is central hyperacusis a symptom of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction?. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 109(10). 915–921. 93 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026