Joseph Wehrmeyer

1.6k citations
65 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Wehrmeyer

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Joseph Wehrmeyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 431
  • Computational Mechanics 944
  • Spectroscopy 276
  • Applied Mathematics 151
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 106
Replace Brandon Yip with:
Brandon Yip United States
Campbell Carter United States
Robert D. Rockwell United States
Christopher P. Goyne United States
Robert W. Pitz United States
Stephen D. Hammack United States
Mikaël Orain France
Roland H. Krauss United States
James C. McDaniel United States
Tarun Mathur United States
Joseph Wehrmeyer relative to Brandon Yip United States Brandon Yip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Brandon Yip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Wehrmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Wehrmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Wehrmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Wehrmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Wehrmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Wehrmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Wehrmeyer. The network helps show where Joseph Wehrmeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Wehrmeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Wehrmeyer Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Wehrmeyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994125
2 1992102
3 200395
4 199985
5 200577
6 200077
7 199251
8 200250
9 200546
10 200446
11 199945
12 200244
13 199037
14 199128
15 200227
16 200625
17 200525
18 199822
19 199617
20 200516

About Joseph Wehrmeyer

Joseph Wehrmeyer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Spectroscopy, Aerospace Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (44 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (28 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (16 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (10 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (8 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (8 papers), Laser Design and Applications (6 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (431 citations), Computational Mechanics (944 citations), Spectroscopy (276 citations), Applied Mathematics (151 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (106 citations). Joseph Wehrmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Pitz, T.S. Cheng, Lubomir Ribarov, G. B. Northam, O. Jarrett, Michael Goldfarb, Eric J. Barth, Tsarng-Sheng Cheng, Peter A. DeBarber and Shengteng Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion and Flame, Applied Physics B, Applied Spectroscopy, AIAA Journal and Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact