Joseph Studer

3.8k citations
121 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 29

Joseph Studer

115 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Joseph Studer
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Applied Psychology 349
  • Clinical Psychology 719
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 47
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 330
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 324
Replace Cath Chapman with:
Cath Chapman Australia
Marloes Kleinjan Netherlands
Jens Christoffer Skogen Norway
Nathaniel R. Riggs United States
Natalya C. Maisel United States
Will M. Aklin United States
José Ramón Fernández Hermida Spain
Hayley A. Hamilton Canada
Joni Vander Bilt United States
Alexis Kuerbis United States
Joseph Studer relative to Cath Chapman Australia Cath Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Cath Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Studer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Studer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Studer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Studer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Studer. The network helps show where Joseph Studer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Studer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Studer Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Studer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 20238
3 20229
4 20216
5 202121
6 202010
7 20202
8 20205
9 20198
10 20193
11 201829
12 20179
13 201647
14 20148
15 201433
16 201425
17 201413
18 201329
19 201330
20
Evaluating the Impact of a Computerized Ambulatory Record
20003

About Joseph Studer

Joseph Studer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Epidemiology and Toxicology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (52 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (25 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (19 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (17 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (11 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (11 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (349 citations), Clinical Psychology (719 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (47 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (330 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (324 citations). Joseph Studer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Gmel, Stéphanie Baggio, Jean‐Bernard Daeppen, Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Nicolas Bertholet, Gisela Labouvie‐Vief, Anne-Laure Gilet, Simon Marmet, Stéphane Deline and Daniel Grühn. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE and Swiss Medical Weekly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026