Joseph M. Hodge
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- History top 2%
- Development top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ronaldo MunckDenis O’HearnBrett M. BennettKe ZhangTae Seok MoonKimberly M. Parker
- Topics
- African history and culture studies (6 papers)Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers)Australian History and Society (2 papers)
- Cited by
- DevelopmentAnthropologyHistory
- Journals
- Environmental Science & TechnologyCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africainesJournal of Southern African Studies
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Joseph M. Hodge
11 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Sociology and Political Science 185
- Anthropology 86
- Political Science and International Relations 75
- History 68
- Development 40
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph M. Hodge
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph M. Hodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph M. Hodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph M. Hodge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph M. Hodge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph M. Hodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph M. Hodge. The network helps show where Joseph M. Hodge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph M. Hodge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph M. Hodge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph M. Hodge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph M. Hodge. Joseph M. Hodge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Triumph of the Expert: Agrarian Doctrines of Development and the Legacies of British Colonialism | 126 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 96 |
About Joseph M. Hodge
Joseph M. Hodge is a scholar working on Horticulture, Anthropology and Development, having authored 14 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (6 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers) and Australian History and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (40 citations), Anthropology (86 citations) and History (68 citations). Joseph M. Hodge has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ronaldo Munck, Denis O’Hearn, Brett M. Bennett, Ke Zhang, Tae Seok Moon and Kimberly M. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines and Journal of Southern African Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.