William E. Friedman

8.1k total citations
104 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

William E. Friedman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Friedman has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 54 papers in Molecular Biology and 47 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in William E. Friedman's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (56 papers), Plant and animal studies (53 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (37 papers). William E. Friedman is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (56 papers), Plant and animal studies (53 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (37 papers). William E. Friedman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. William E. Friedman's co-authors include Joseph H. Williams, Jeffrey S. Carmichael, Sandra K. Floyd, David H. Benzing, Martha E. Cook, Michael D. Purugganan, Richard C. Moore, Donald Ott, Julien Bachelier and A. Renfrow and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

William E. Friedman

102 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William E. Friedman United States 39 2.1k 2.0k 2.0k 175 135 104 3.4k
Susan M. Swensen United States 18 1.9k 0.9× 1.5k 0.7× 1.1k 0.6× 173 1.0× 233 1.7× 24 2.7k
Phillip Cribb United Kingdom 24 2.1k 1.0× 1.3k 0.6× 920 0.5× 377 2.2× 122 0.9× 171 2.5k
Cynthia M. Morton United States 26 1.8k 0.8× 1.4k 0.7× 954 0.5× 167 1.0× 281 2.1× 51 2.5k
Paul A. Gadek Australia 26 1.6k 0.7× 1.2k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 239 1.4× 166 1.2× 68 2.4k
Hartmut H. Hilger Germany 25 1.7k 0.8× 1.0k 0.5× 1.1k 0.6× 152 0.9× 185 1.4× 97 2.2k
Ricarda Riina Spain 24 2.2k 1.0× 1.3k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 334 1.9× 292 2.2× 95 2.8k
Sigrid Liede‐Schumann Germany 27 2.1k 1.0× 1.3k 0.6× 933 0.5× 189 1.1× 81 0.6× 172 2.5k
Barbara G. Briggs Australia 19 1.6k 0.8× 1.0k 0.5× 821 0.4× 242 1.4× 136 1.0× 71 2.0k
Martin Cheek United Kingdom 25 2.2k 1.1× 1.1k 0.5× 1.3k 0.6× 402 2.3× 106 0.8× 222 3.1k
Robert A. Price United States 25 1.4k 0.6× 1.1k 0.6× 943 0.5× 202 1.2× 316 2.3× 46 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Friedman. The network helps show where William E. Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Friedman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Friedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Friedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Friedman. William E. Friedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Friedman, William E., et al.. (2023). Cercis canadensis ‘Arnold Banner’: A Periclinal Chimera of Eastern Redbud with Prominent Nectar Guides. HortScience. 58(12). 1484–1487. 1 indexed citations
2.
Friedman, William E., et al.. (2022). Rapid diversification of vascular architecture underlies the Carboniferous fern radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 289(1973). 20212209–20212209. 10 indexed citations
3.
DaCosta, Jeffrey M., Christopher J. Grassa, P. R. V. Satyaki, et al.. (2020). Water lily ( Nymphaea thermarum ) genome reveals variable genomic signatures of ancient vascular cambium losses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(15). 8649–8656. 40 indexed citations
4.
Diggle, Pamela K., et al.. (2018). Evidence for parent-of-origin effects and interparental conflict in seeds of an ancient flowering plant lineage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 285(1872). 20172491–20172491. 22 indexed citations
5.
Friedman, William E., Michael S. Dosmann, David E. Boufford, et al.. (2016). Developing an Exemplary Collection: A Vision for the Next Century at the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. Arnoldia.. 73(3). 2–18. 4 indexed citations
6.
Friedman, William E.. (2015). Evolving words and the egg‐bearing tubes of Welwitschia (Welwitschiaceae). American Journal of Botany. 102(2). 176–179. 3 indexed citations
7.
Losada, Juan M., M. Herrero, J.I. Hormaza, & William E. Friedman. (2014). Arabinogalactan proteins mark stigmatic receptivity in the protogynous flowers of Magnolia virginiana (Magnoliaceae). American Journal of Botany. 101(11). 1963–1975. 16 indexed citations
8.
Friedman, William E.. (2013). Mutants in our Midst. Arnoldia.. 71(1). 2–14. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bachelier, Julien & William E. Friedman. (2011). Female gamete competition in an ancient angiosperm lineage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(30). 12360–12365. 24 indexed citations
10.
Friedman, William E.. (2011). Plant Genomics: Homoplasy Heaven in a Lycophyte Genome. Current Biology. 21(14). R554–R556. 6 indexed citations
11.
Friedman, William E., et al.. (2009). Female gametophyte and early seed development in Peperomia (Piperaceae). American Journal of Botany. 97(1). 1–14. 64 indexed citations
12.
Friedman, William E., et al.. (2007). Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in Lycopodiaceae. New Phytologist. 177(3). 790–801. 68 indexed citations
13.
Friedman, William E.. (2006). Embryological evidence for developmental lability during early angiosperm evolution. Nature. 441(7091). 337–340. 70 indexed citations
14.
Friedman, William E.. (2006). Sex among the flowers.. Natural history. 115(9). 48–53. 5 indexed citations
15.
Friedman, William E., Richard C. Moore, & Michael D. Purugganan. (2004). The evolution of plant development. American Journal of Botany. 91(10). 1726–1741. 118 indexed citations
16.
Friedman, William E.. (2001). Comparative embryology of basal angiosperms. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 4(1). 14–20. 19 indexed citations
17.
Friedman, William E. & Sandra K. Floyd. (2001). PERSPECTIVE: THE ORIGIN OF FLOWERING PLANTS AND THEIR REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY?A TALE OF TWO PHYLOGENIES. Evolution. 55(2). 217–231. 39 indexed citations
18.
Friedman, William E.. (1993). The evolutionary history of the seed plant male gametophyte. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 8(1). 15–21. 41 indexed citations
19.
Friedman, William E., et al.. (1991). Developmentally regulated antigen associated with calcium crystals in tobacco anthers. Planta. 186(1). 13–6. 13 indexed citations
20.
Golden, A. M. & William E. Friedman. (1964). Some taxonomic studies on the genus Criconema (Nematoda: Criconematidae).. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 31(1). 47–59. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026