Joseph E. Brenner

43 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Joseph E. Brenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 77
Replace Mary Tiles with:
Mary Tiles United States
Évandro Agazzi Mexico
Lorenz Krüger Germany
Felix Geyer Netherlands
Adrienne van den Bogaard Netherlands
Phyllis Illari United Kingdom
Alan Musgrave New Zealand
André Kukla Canada
Tim Mulgan New Zealand
Erik Banks United States
Joseph E. Brenner relative to Mary Tiles United States Mary Tiles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Mary Tiles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Brenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Brenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Brenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Brenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Brenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Brenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Brenner. The network helps show where Joseph E. Brenner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Joseph E. Brenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph E. Brenner Line = papers co-authored together Joseph E. Brenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 202116
3 202011
4 201911
5 20173
6 20174
7 20153
8 20151
9 20145
10 20131
11 20135
12 20118
13
WU KUN AND THE METAPHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION
201117
14 20119
15 201010
16 20107
17 200937
18 200547
19 200567
20 200428

About Joseph E. Brenner

Joseph E. Brenner is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Theoretical Computer Science, Management of Technology and Innovation and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Science and Education Research (18 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (9 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (4 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (92 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (77 citations). Joseph E. Brenner has collaborated with scholars based in France, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ellen R. Shaffer, Abir U. Igamberdiev, Rebeca Jasso‐Aguilar, Howard Waitzkin, Wu Kun, Robert Coles, Mark Burgin and Eugene E. Van Tamelen. Their work appears in journals such as Logic and Logical Philosophy, tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Biosystems and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026