Joseph C. Griffis
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jerzy P. SzaflarskiJane B. AllendorferMaurizio CorbettaGordon L. ShulmanNicholas V. MetcalfRodolphe NenertKristina VisscherLawrence Ver Hoef
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsNeuroImageBrain
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySpain
In The Last Decade
Joseph C. Griffis
29 papers receiving 1000 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience 685
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 335
- Neurology 194
- Psychiatry and Mental health 145
- Rehabilitation 114
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Griffis
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Griffis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Griffis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Griffis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Griffis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Griffis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Griffis. The network helps show where Joseph C. Griffis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. Griffis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. Griffis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. Griffis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. Griffis. Joseph C. Griffis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 87 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 127 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Joseph C. Griffis
Joseph C. Griffis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (685 citations), Neurology (194 citations) and Rehabilitation (114 citations). Joseph C. Griffis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jerzy P. Szaflarski, Jane B. Allendorfer, Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L. Shulman, Nicholas V. Metcalf, Rodolphe Nenert, Kristina Visscher, Lawrence Ver Hoef, Jennifer Vannest and Gustavo Deco. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, NeuroImage and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.